Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were waiting for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"we were waiting for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that someone was expecting or hoping for something to happen. For example, "We were waiting for news from the doctor, but the call never came."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We were waiting for that.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"We were waiting for hours.

After all, we were waiting for pie!

News & Media

The New York Times

We were waiting for God's voice!

We were waiting for it".

News & Media

The Guardian

We were waiting for them.

This is what we were waiting for.

News & Media

The Guardian

We were waiting for the right time".

We were waiting for a white guy.

So we were waiting for that".

1 20 p.m.: Ah, here's what we were waiting for.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we were waiting for" to clearly indicate a period of anticipation before an event or outcome. For example, "We were waiting for the rain to stop before continuing our hike."

Common error

Avoid using "we are waiting for" when referring to a past event. "We were waiting for" correctly places the action in the past.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were waiting for" functions as a verb phrase, expressing a state of anticipation or expectation for a specific event, person, or object. It indicates a past continuous action. As Ludwig examples confirm, the phrase commonly introduces the object of expectation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Science

8%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we were waiting for" is a common and grammatically sound way to express past anticipation or expectation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's most frequently found in news and media, with occasional use in scientific and formal business contexts. When writing, ensure the tense aligns with the timeframe you're describing. For alternatives, consider "we anticipated" or "we expected" for slightly different nuances. Remember to use "we were waiting for" when you're referring to an action that was happening in the past.

FAQs

How can I use "we were waiting for" in a sentence?

Use "we were waiting for" to describe a past period of anticipation, such as "We were waiting for the bus, but it never arrived".

What can I say instead of "we were waiting for"?

You can use alternatives like "we anticipated", "we expected", or "we looked forward to", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "we were waiting for" or "we are waiting for"?

"We were waiting for" is used for past events, while "we are waiting for" is used for present or future anticipation. Choose the tense that matches the time frame you're describing.

What's the difference between "we were waiting for" and "we had been waiting for"?

"We were waiting for" describes a continuous action in the past, while "we had been waiting for" emphasizes the duration of the waiting period before another event occurred.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: