Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were waiting for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"we were waiting for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that someone was expecting or hoping for something to happen. For example, "We were waiting for news from the doctor, but the call never came."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
We were waiting for that.
News & Media
"We were waiting for hours.
News & Media
After all, we were waiting for pie!
News & Media
We were waiting for God's voice!
News & Media
We were waiting for it".
News & Media
We were waiting for them.
News & Media
This is what we were waiting for.
News & Media
We were waiting for the right time".
News & Media
We were waiting for a white guy.
News & Media
So we were waiting for that".
News & Media
1 20 p.m.: Ah, here's what we were waiting for.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were waiting for" to clearly indicate a period of anticipation before an event or outcome. For example, "We were waiting for the rain to stop before continuing our hike."
Common error
Avoid using "we are waiting for" when referring to a past event. "We were waiting for" correctly places the action in the past.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were waiting for" functions as a verb phrase, expressing a state of anticipation or expectation for a specific event, person, or object. It indicates a past continuous action. As Ludwig examples confirm, the phrase commonly introduces the object of expectation.
Frequent in
News & Media
85%
Science
8%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
Academia
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "we were waiting for" is a common and grammatically sound way to express past anticipation or expectation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's most frequently found in news and media, with occasional use in scientific and formal business contexts. When writing, ensure the tense aligns with the timeframe you're describing. For alternatives, consider "we anticipated" or "we expected" for slightly different nuances. Remember to use "we were waiting for" when you're referring to an action that was happening in the past.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we expected
A direct synonym, focusing on belief that something would occur.
we were anticipating
Uses the continuous form of "anticipate", adding a sense of ongoing expectation.
we anticipated
Replaces "waiting" with a more formal verb, implying expectation.
we had been awaiting
Emphasizes the duration of the waiting period.
we looked forward to
Expresses a positive expectation or pleasure in anticipation.
we were prepared for
Highlights readiness or preparedness for an event.
we were watching for
Implies observing carefully for something to happen.
we were on the lookout for
Indicates actively searching or expecting something's appearance.
we were in expectation of
A more formal way of expressing anticipation.
we were counting on
Implies relying on something to happen.
FAQs
How can I use "we were waiting for" in a sentence?
Use "we were waiting for" to describe a past period of anticipation, such as "We were waiting for the bus, but it never arrived".
What can I say instead of "we were waiting for"?
You can use alternatives like "we anticipated", "we expected", or "we looked forward to", depending on the context.
Which is correct, "we were waiting for" or "we are waiting for"?
"We were waiting for" is used for past events, while "we are waiting for" is used for present or future anticipation. Choose the tense that matches the time frame you're describing.
What's the difference between "we were waiting for" and "we had been waiting for"?
"We were waiting for" describes a continuous action in the past, while "we had been waiting for" emphasizes the duration of the waiting period before another event occurred.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested