Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were told to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'we were told to' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to convey that you or someone else was instructed to do or not do something. For example: We were told to leave the building immediately during the fire drill.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
we were asked to
we were advised to
we were instructed to
we were requested to
we were given the task of
we were scheduled to
we were limited to
we were encouraged to
we were meant to
we were obliged to
we were obligated to
we were constrained to
we were committed to
we were supposed to
we were used to
we were pleased to
we were determined to
we were spoken to
we were required to
it was requested that we
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We were told to get in.
News & Media
"We were told to withdraw yesterday".
News & Media
Again, we were told to look down.
News & Media
We were told to send him out.
News & Media
We were told to make trenches.
News & Media
Instead, we were told to go shopping.
News & Media
We were told to go high.
News & Media
We were told to expect big exercises.
News & Media
To this end, we were told to keep a diary.
News & Media
"We were told to vacate the premises by June".
News & Media
We were told to hang out while they warmed up.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we were told to", ensure clarity about who issued the instruction to avoid ambiguity. For example, "We were told to submit the report by Friday" could be improved to "Our manager told us to submit the report by Friday".
Common error
Avoid using "we were told to" when you can actively state who gave the instruction. Instead of saying "We were told to be quiet", consider "The librarian asked us to be quiet" for a more direct and engaging sentence.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were told to" functions as a passive construction indicating that the subject (we) received an instruction or directive. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability in English writing. This usage conveys that an unspecified source issued a command or suggestion that the subject was expected to follow.
Frequent in
News & Media
86%
Formal & Business
7%
Science
7%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we were told to" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that a group received an instruction or directive. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for written English and frequently appears in news and media contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the source of the instruction and consider using active voice when possible for more direct communication. Be aware of the passive voice construction, and in formal contexts, alternatives like "we received instructions to" might be more appropriate. The phrase serves the purpose of reporting instructions given, and its neutrality makes it versatile across different registers.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were instructed to
Similar to "directed", but slightly less forceful, implying a structured teaching or guidance scenario.
we were directed to
Emphasizes the authoritative nature of the instruction, suggesting a formal command.
we were requested to
Softer approach implying a polite instruction, rather than a strict command.
we received instructions to
Replaces "told" with a more formal term, "received instructions", emphasizing the reception of directives.
we were asked to
An even softer version of "requested", implying a question or suggestion rather than a command.
our orders were to
Similar to "we had orders to", but emphasizes the formal, written nature of the directive.
we were advised to
Suggests that the instruction was given as advice, not a direct order.
we had orders to
Suggests a military or hierarchical context where instructions are commands.
we were given the task of
Focuses on the assignment or duty that resulted from the instruction.
it was indicated to us that we should
A more roundabout and formal way of stating the instruction, useful in bureaucratic contexts.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "we were told to" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "we received instructions to" or "we were directed to". These options convey a sense of authority and official instruction.
What's a more casual alternative to "we were told to"?
In informal contexts, you could use phrases such as "we were asked to" or "we were advised to". These options soften the directive and make it sound more like a suggestion or request.
Is "we were told to" grammatically correct?
Yes, "we were told to" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice to indicate that "we" received an instruction from an unspecified source. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and can be used in written English.
When should I avoid using "we were told to"?
It's best to avoid "we were told to" when the source of the instruction is known and can be stated directly. Using the active voice (e.g., "The teacher told us to... ") provides more clarity and makes your writing more engaging. Also, be precise about what you "were instructed to" do.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested