Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were supposed to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we were supposed to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a plan, obligation, expectation, or duty that has not been fulfilled, usually due to a change in circumstances. Example: "We were supposed to meet at the park, but it started raining, so we had to cancel our plans."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We did what we were supposed to.

We were supposed to shout "Yeah!

News & Media

The New Yorker

We were supposed to be weird.

News & Media

The New York Times

We were supposed to win.

We were supposed to stop writing jokes.

News & Media

The New York Times

We were supposed to comment on them".

That's where we were supposed to play".

We'd cry when we were supposed to cry, laugh when we were supposed to laugh.

News & Media

The Guardian

We were supposed to have flying cars by now.

We were supposed to be past all that by now.

We were supposed to be friends, allies and neighbours.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we were supposed to" to clearly communicate unfulfilled plans or expectations. This phrase is versatile and understood in both formal and informal settings.

Common error

Ensure clarity by explicitly stating why the intended action didn't occur when using "we were supposed to". For example, instead of "We were supposed to finish the project", specify "We were supposed to finish the project, but we ran out of resources."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were supposed to" functions as a modal construction expressing a past obligation, expectation, or intention that was not realized. Ludwig AI's analysis highlights its frequent use in indicating unfulfilled plans, as demonstrated in the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Sports

29%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Science

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we were supposed to" is a very common and grammatically correct way to express unfulfilled plans, expectations, or obligations. Ludwig AI confirms its broad applicability across various contexts, predominantly in News & Media and Sports, and to a lesser extent in Academia. Related phrases such as "we were meant to" and "we were expected to" offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying why the intended action didn't occur. By avoiding vagueness and utilizing its expressive power, writers can effectively communicate deviations from plans and expectations with precision.

FAQs

How can I use "we were supposed to" in a sentence?

Use "we were supposed to" to indicate an expectation, plan, or duty that didn't happen, often due to unforeseen circumstances. For example, "We were supposed to go to the concert, but it was canceled".

What's a more formal alternative to "we were supposed to"?

For formal contexts, consider using phrases like "we were expected to" or "it was our understanding that we would", which convey a similar meaning with a more professional tone.

Is "we were suppose to" grammatically correct?

No, "we were suppose to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "we were supposed to", where "supposed" is the past participle of "suppose".

What's the difference between "we were supposed to" and "we were going to"?

"We were going to" simply indicates a plan, while "we were supposed to" implies a plan that was not fulfilled, often due to an obligation or expectation. The latter carries a sense of responsibility or duty. For example, "We were going to go to the party (but decided not to)" vs. "We were supposed to go to the party (but had to work)".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: