Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were stirred
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were stirred" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a feeling of being emotionally moved or affected by something, often in a positive or profound way. Example: "After watching the documentary, we were stirred by the stories of resilience and hope shared by the survivors."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
We were stirred.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
His insights into the nature of love don't apply just to a world that perished long ago; they're timeless, or will last as long as we are stirred by stories of disastrous passion.
News & Media
Which is cool with us, that is, until we are stirred by some injustice; harmonically, rhythmically, financially, or metaphysically.
News & Media
As a members of the audience, we are stirred by a sense of being hit by the storm, in a non-manipulative way, which moves us to delve into and touch our own storms within.
News & Media
And his listeners' hearts were stirred.
News & Media
Mixtures were stirred in liquid state.
Solutions were stirred magnetically throughout the experiments.
Science
The flasks were stirred at 150 rpm.
The reaction mixtures were stirred immediately.
Solutions were stirred for ∼12 h.
Science
Suspensions were stirred at 300 rpm.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were stirred" to convey a sense of being emotionally moved or inspired by something, especially when describing a shared experience or response to an event.
Common error
Avoid using "we were stirred" in situations where the emotional impact is minimal. Reserve it for moments of genuine inspiration, profound realization, or significant emotional response. Using it too often diminishes its effect.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were stirred" functions as a declarative statement, expressing a shared emotional experience. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in conveying feelings of being moved or inspired. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
32%
Encyclopedias
18%
Less common in
Reference
0%
Wiki
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "we were stirred" is a grammatically sound and relatively common expression used to describe a shared emotional experience. According to Ludwig AI, it conveys a sense of being emotionally moved or affected by something. It appears in a variety of contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. When writing, remember to reserve this phrase for situations where the emotional impact is significant, and to select synonyms such as "we were moved" or "we were touched" to enrich your writing and add nuance.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were moved
This alternative directly replaces "stirred" with "moved", offering a simple synonym with almost identical emotional weight.
we were touched
Similar to "moved", "touched" implies a gentle but significant emotional impact.
our hearts were touched
Rephrasing to focus on the heart adds emphasis to emotionality.
we were deeply affected
By adding "deeply", this alternative intensifies the emotional impact, making it closer in feeling to "stirred".
we were affected
This is a broader term indicating that something had an impact on us, though it's less emotionally charged than "stirred".
we were inspired
This suggests a positive emotional response, implying that we were motivated or encouraged by something.
we felt a deep emotional connection
This alternative uses a more descriptive phrase to explain the feeling conveyed by "stirred".
we were roused
"Roused" suggests being awakened or stirred into action, often with a sense of urgency.
we were captivated
This implies that we were completely fascinated or charmed, leading to a strong emotional connection.
we were ignited
This suggests that something sparked a strong emotional response or passion within us.
FAQs
What does "we were stirred" mean?
The phrase "we were stirred" means that a group of people experienced a strong emotional reaction, often feeling moved, inspired, or deeply touched by something. It indicates a significant emotional impact.
When is it appropriate to use "we were stirred"?
It's appropriate to use "we were stirred" when describing a collective emotional response to something significant, such as a powerful speech, a moving performance, or an inspiring event. It's best suited for situations where the emotional impact is substantial.
What are some alternatives to "we were stirred"?
You can use alternatives like "we were moved", "we were touched", or "we were inspired" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
How does "we were stirred" differ from "we were excited"?
"We were excited" suggests a feeling of enthusiasm and anticipation, while "we were stirred" implies a deeper, more profound emotional response. Stirring often involves a sense of being moved to action or feeling a significant emotional connection, which is different from mere excitement.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested