we were not provided with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we were not provided with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was not given or supplied to you or your group. Example: "In our recent meeting, we were not provided with the necessary documents to make an informed decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

"We were not provided with that information," Ms. McLaughlin said, adding, "I would think we should have been".

The New York Times

We were not provided with the notes taken by the ISPs.

BMJ Open

Furthermore, we were not provided with details of intraoperative hemodynamics instability and drug administration.

Critical Care

Other incomplete responses meant that we were not provided with information that we could utilise in our analysis.

BMJ Open

Note that we cannot display certain values referring to markers from GSE10950 for NC since we were not provided with the corresponding subnetworks nor the software.

Bioinformatics

For these we have only the imputed values and an indication that they were nondetects; we were not provided with the sample-specific detection limits (although median detection limits for specific surveys are listed in the publications).

Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

We were forced to go in and give evidence... and we weren't provided with the confidentiality that one would expect".

The Guardian - Sport

It is impossible to determine which financial institutions are holding things up, but no one has offered any technical reason why we are not provided with better descriptions.

The New York Times

In empirical research, we are not provided with a single accurate measure of an individual's health but rather proxies such as specific diagnoses.

IZA Journal of Labor Policy

We are not provided with phones for communication.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

And we are not provided with a calculation for the probability of translation spontaneously emerging and fixing.

Biology Direct

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we were not provided with", ensure the context clearly indicates who "we" refers to and what was not provided. This avoids ambiguity and makes your writing more precise.

Common error

While grammatically correct, overusing the passive voice (like in "we were not provided with") can make writing seem indirect. Consider using the active voice when appropriate for a more direct and impactful statement: "They did not provide us with..."

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "we were not provided with" is to indicate a lack of receipt or supply. It's a passive construction where "we" is the subject receiving the action of "being provided with." Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

29%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Wiki

14%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we were not provided with" is a grammatically sound and reasonably common expression used to indicate a lack of receipt. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It is frequently found in scientific and news contexts, carrying a neutral to formal tone. When writing, it is crucial to ensure clarity regarding who "we" refers to and what specific item was not provided. For more directness, consider using active voice alternatives such as "They did not provide us with...". This expression is frequently seen in reporting deficiencies or explaining limitations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we were not given

A simpler and more direct way of expressing that something was not handed over.

we did not receive

Uses the active voice and the common verb "receive" to indicate non-receipt.

we were not furnished with

A more formal and sophisticated way of saying we were not provided with.

we didn't get

A more informal way of saying we did not receive.

it was not supplied to us

Focuses on the lack of supply.

we were not afforded

Indicates that an opportunity or resource was not made available.

we were denied

Highlights the act of refusal rather than simply not receiving something.

we were refused

Emphasizes the act of being turned down or rejected.

we lacked

Focuses on the absence or deficiency of something.

access was not granted to us

Specifically refers to the inability to access something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "we were not provided with" to sound more direct?

You can use the active voice for a more direct tone. For example, say "They did not provide us with..." or "We did not receive..." These alternatives are often more impactful and concise.

Is it grammatically correct to use "we were not provided with"?

Yes, the phrase "we were not provided with" is grammatically correct and follows standard English grammar rules. It's a passive construction indicating that something was not given or supplied.

What's the difference between "we were not provided with" and "we did not receive"?

While both phrases convey a lack of receipt, "we were not provided with" implies that someone had a responsibility to supply something. "We did not receive", on the other hand, is a more general statement of non-receipt, without implying an obligation. You can also use "we didn't get", which is more informal.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use "we were not provided with"?

The phrase "we were not provided with" is appropriate in formal and professional contexts, such as reports, official correspondence, and academic writing. It's suitable when you want to state that something was not supplied in a neutral, factual manner.