we were level

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we were level" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that two or more parties are equal in terms of score, status, or understanding in a given context. Example: "After the first half of the game, we were level with the opposing team, both having scored two goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

"We were level when we rounded the buoy but she had a bad turn and fell behind.

The Guardian - Sport

"At Kiawah Island [in 1991] we were level going into the singles.

BBC

"We have changed many players in the squad and in the team and before the game, we were level in the table with a great team like Sweden".

BBC

"It's going to be challenging because we're on -10, if we were level with everyone else, we could progress comfortably, I believe.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

We're level again.

The Guardian - Sport

We're level!

The Guardian - Sport

He shanks a return and we're level again.

The Guardian - Sport

Six minutes to go and we're level.

The Guardian - Sport

We're level in this tie at 1-1, aNapolioli's dander is up!

The Guardian - Sport

And Robson goes long yet again and we're level again.

The Guardian - Sport

And with that we're level: three-all in the first.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we were level" to clearly indicate that two or more entities are equal in a specific metric, such as score, position, or understanding. Ensure the context makes it clear what aspect is being compared.

Common error

Avoid using "we were level" when the context doesn't clearly establish what is being compared. For example, saying "we were level" without specifying whether it refers to points, understanding, or resources can lead to confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were level" functions as a declarative statement indicating equality between two or more entities at a past point in time. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we were level" is a grammatically sound way to express equality between two or more entities in a past context. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. The phrase most commonly appears in news and media, particularly in sports reporting, to indicate equal scores or standings. While interchangeable with alternatives such as "we were even" or "we were tied", it's important to ensure the context clearly defines what aspect is being compared to avoid ambiguity. Pay attention to the tense to be consistent between past and present states.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we were even

Replaces "level" with "even", a direct synonym in this context.

we were tied

Uses "tied" to indicate an equal score or standing.

the scores were level

Changes the sentence structure to focus on the scores themselves being equal.

we had the same score

More explicitly states that the scores were identical.

our scores were equal

A more formal way of stating that the scores were the same.

we were on par

Employs the idiom "on par" to convey equality.

we both had the same points

Specifically refers to points as the measure of equality.

we were neck and neck

Suggests a close race or competition where both parties are nearly equal.

we stood equal

A slightly more literary way of expressing equality in standing or position.

we were all square

Uses "square" to mean equal or balanced, common in some dialects.

FAQs

What does "we were level" mean?

The phrase "we were level" indicates that two or more parties were equal in a particular aspect, such as score, position, or understanding at a certain point in time.

What can I say instead of "we were level"?

You can use alternatives like "we were even", "we were tied", or "our scores were equal" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "we are level"?

The correctness depends on the tense needed. "We are level" implies the equality is current, while "we were level" refers to a past state of equality.

How do I use "we were level" in a sentence?

You can use it to describe a past state of equality: "After the first half, we were level with the leading team." or "At that stage of the negotiation, we were level in our understanding of the terms."