Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were just talking
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were just talking" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a recent conversation or discussion that took place, often to provide context or continuity in dialogue. Example: "I didn't mean to interrupt, but we were just talking about the new project deadlines."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(17)
we were discussing
we were talking
we had a conversation recently
we just defended
we just caught
we only spoke
we recently talked
we just question
we just stayed
we just spoke
we communicated earlier
we just participated
we talked moments ago
we barely spoke
it was just a conversation
it was just a coincidence
it was just a misunderstanding
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
And we were just talking logistics.
News & Media
And we were just talking as friends.
News & Media
We were just talking about you.
News & Media
We were just talking about her".
News & Media
"We were just talking about it, we don't like it".
News & Media
The door was open and we were just talking.
News & Media
This ties directly to what we were just talking about.
News & Media
"You know what we were just talking about?" Piasecki said.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
3 human-written examples
We're just talking".
News & Media
Otherwise we are just talking.
Academia
We're just talking about ordinary food".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were just talking" to smoothly transition into a topic already under discussion, creating a sense of continuity in conversations or writing. This phrase helps to contextualize subsequent statements and avoid abrupt topic shifts.
Common error
While "we were just talking" is perfectly acceptable in informal settings, it can sound too casual in formal writing or presentations. Opt for phrases like "we were discussing" or "we engaged in a conversation regarding" /s/we+engaged+in+a+conversation+regarding in such situations to maintain a professional tone.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were just talking" functions as a conversational filler or a transitional phrase. It often introduces a topic that was already being discussed, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples that show its use in various media contexts. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Academia
12%
Science
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we were just talking" is a grammatically sound and very common phrase used to indicate a recent or ongoing conversation. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English, frequently appearing in news, media, and academic contexts. While versatile, remember to consider the context and opt for more formal alternatives like "we were discussing" in professional settings. Use it to smoothly introduce topics or provide context, ensuring a cohesive flow in your communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were simply discussing
Replaces "just talking" with "simply discussing", implying a slightly more formal or focused conversation.
we were having a conversation
A more general and neutral alternative to "we were just talking".
we were merely conversing
Substitutes "just talking" with "merely conversing", suggesting a casual and perhaps unimportant exchange.
we had been talking about
Shifts the focus to the topic of conversation, emphasizing its importance.
we were in the middle of a discussion
Indicates the conversation was ongoing and perhaps interrupted, adding a sense of immediacy.
we happened to be chatting
Replaces "just talking" with "happened to be chatting", emphasizing the accidental or spontaneous nature of the conversation.
we were only speaking
Highlights the act of speaking, suggesting the absence of any further action or intention.
we were touching on the subject of
Implies the conversation involved briefly mentioning a topic without going into great detail.
we were exchanging words about
Emphasizes the reciprocal nature of the conversation, suggesting an exchange of ideas or information.
we engaged in a discussion regarding
Presents the conversation in a formal way by changing "we were just talking" to "we engaged in a discussion regarding".
FAQs
How can I use "we were just talking" in a sentence?
You can use "we were just talking" to refer to a recent conversation. For example, "I didn't mean to interrupt, we were just talking about the upcoming conference."
What is a more formal alternative to "we were just talking"?
In more formal contexts, you might consider using alternatives such as "we were discussing" or "we were in the process of discussing."
Is it grammatically correct to say "we was just talking"?
No, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "we were just talking". The verb 'were' is used with the pronoun 'we'.
What's the difference between "we were talking" and "we were just talking"?
"We were talking" is a general statement about a past conversation. Adding "just" emphasizes the recency or casual nature of the discussion. Consider that "we were discussing" can be interchangeable in a more formal situation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested