Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were full of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we were full of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a state of being filled with a particular emotion, feeling, or quality. Example: "After the surprise party, we were full of joy and gratitude for our friends."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

40 human-written examples

"We were full of power and ambition".

News & Media

The New York Times

We were full of holes.

They knew we were full of stress".

News & Media

The Guardian

But we were full of idealism.

News & Media

The Guardian

We were full of grace that day.

"We were full of questions," Ms. Mitchell said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

20 human-written examples

"We are full of relief and disbelief".

News & Media

The New Yorker

"We are full of pain," said Turkiya Fehan.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We're full of illness.

News & Media

The Guardian

"We are full of dinosaurs here.

"We're full of confidence: we have a magnificent chance.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we were full of" to vividly describe a shared feeling, ambition, or even a physical state. This phrase adds emotional depth and helps readers connect with the experience you're conveying.

Common error

While versatile, "full of" can sound informal in certain professional or academic settings. Opt for alternatives like "abundant in" or "replete with" to maintain a more sophisticated tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were full of" functions as a descriptive phrase, where 'we' is the subject and 'were full of' serves as the predicate describing the state or condition of the subject. Ludwig's examples show it commonly describes states of emotion, ambition, or physical sensation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

97%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we were full of" is a common and grammatically correct way to express a shared feeling, intention, or state. Ludwig AI affirms its usability, and the numerous examples from diverse sources demonstrate its widespread application, particularly in news and media. While generally neutral in tone, it's essential to consider context and opt for more formal alternatives in academic or professional writing where appropriate. The frequency of use and variety of related phrases demonstrate that "we were full of" is a versatile and useful expression in the English language.

FAQs

How can I use "we were full of" in a sentence?

The phrase "we were full of" can be used to describe a shared emotion, intention, or even a physical sensation. For example, "we were full of hope" expresses a shared optimistic outlook.

What are some alternatives to "we were full of"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "we were brimming with", "we were overflowing with", or "we were imbued with" to convey a similar meaning.

Is "we were full of" grammatically correct?

Yes, "we were full of" is grammatically correct. The construction follows standard English grammar rules, with "we" as the subject, "were" as the past tense of the verb "to be", and "full of" as a prepositional phrase modifying "were".

What's the difference between "we were full of" and "we had a lot of"?

While both phrases indicate abundance, "we were full of" often implies a more intense or emotional filling, whereas "we had a lot of" is more neutral and quantitative. For example, "we were full of joy" suggests a profound emotional experience, while "we had a lot of work" simply indicates a large quantity of tasks.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: