Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were flabbergasted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were flabbergasted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express extreme surprise or shock at a situation or event. Example: "When we heard the news of the unexpected merger, we were flabbergasted."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
we were astonished
we were amazed
we were stunned
we were shocked
we were surprised
we were taken aback
we were dumbfounded
we obtained
we were supposed
we were presented
we were observed
we were left
we were nominated
we were granted
we were kosher
we were devastated
we were marooned
we were presented with
we were introduced
we were horrified
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
17 human-written examples
"We were flabbergasted.
News & Media
"We were flabbergasted," Ms. Morgenstern said.
News & Media
We were flabbergasted and not a little ruffled.
News & Media
We were flabbergasted by the birds' spring return times.
News & Media
We were flabbergasted because it was so different from the show.
News & Media
"We had a hidden-garden tour in Pittsfield, and we were flabbergasted when we got 400 people," she said.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
43 human-written examples
We are flabbergasted.
News & Media
Really, we're flabbergasted.
News & Media
"We're flabbergasted," he said.
News & Media
"If we're flabbergasted," Bills General Manager Tom Donahoe said about the five-week process of acquiring Bledsoe, "we're flabbergasted there weren't more teams that got involved".
News & Media
"We are flabbergasted that someone with absolutely no connection to this case can be allowed to bring an action like this.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we were flabbergasted" when you want to express a strong sense of surprise and disbelief, often in response to something unexpected or shocking. It is more impactful than simply saying "we were surprised".
Common error
While "we were flabbergasted" is widely understood, it can sound slightly informal in highly professional or academic writing. Consider alternatives like "we were astonished" or "we were taken aback" for a more polished tone.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were flabbergasted" functions as a declarative statement expressing a reaction of extreme surprise and astonishment. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable in written English, serving to vividly convey a feeling of being overwhelmed by surprise. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its usage in various news and media contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
87%
Formal & Business
6%
Academia
3%
Less common in
Science
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we were flabbergasted" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to express a strong feeling of surprise and astonishment. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is perfectly acceptable in written English, although its register leans towards neutral-informal. You'll find it most frequently in news and media contexts. While "we were flabbergasted" effectively conveys strong surprise, be mindful of your audience and consider more formal alternatives like "we were astonished" in professional or academic settings. When aiming for impact and a touch of informality, however, "we were flabbergasted" is an excellent choice.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were astonished
Emphasizes surprise and amazement, slightly more formal.
we were amazed
Highlights a feeling of wonder and delight in addition to surprise.
we were stunned
Suggests a stronger sense of shock and disbelief.
we were shocked
Implies a negative surprise, often due to something unpleasant or disturbing.
we were surprised
A general term for experiencing something unexpected.
we were taken aback
Indicates a sudden and often unpleasant surprise.
we were bewildered
Focuses on confusion and disorientation caused by surprise.
we were dumbfounded
Highlights the inability to speak due to surprise.
we couldn't believe it
Emphasizes disbelief and incredulity.
we were incredulous
Suggests a skeptical surprise, questioning the truth or validity of something.
FAQs
What does "we were flabbergasted" mean?
The phrase "we were flabbergasted" means that the speakers were extremely surprised or astonished, often to the point of being speechless or unable to react immediately. It implies a strong sense of disbelief and wonder at something unexpected.
How to use "we were flabbergasted" in a sentence?
You can use "we were flabbergasted" to describe your reaction to a surprising event. For example, "We were flabbergasted when we heard the news about the company's record profits."
Which is correct, "we were flabbergasted" or "we are flabbergasted"?
"We were flabbergasted" (past tense) is used to describe a past reaction, while "we are flabbergasted" (present tense) describes a current reaction. Choose the tense that accurately reflects when the surprise occurred.
What can I say instead of "we were flabbergasted"?
You can use alternatives like "we were astonished", "we were amazed", or "we were stunned" depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested