Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were exposed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were exposed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where individuals have been made vulnerable to something, such as risks, dangers, or influences. Example: "During the experiment, we were exposed to various environmental factors that could affect the results."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
49 human-written examples
We were exposed and raw, suddenly weakened, even somewhat helpless.
News & Media
We were exposed to death and illness every day".
News & Media
"We were exposed to a very good team," said Cotter.
News & Media
So what were the odds we were exposed?
News & Media
We were exposed, vulnerable to marriage's strange power once more.
News & Media
We were exposed to different sides of each other.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
11 human-written examples
We are exposed.
News & Media
"Now, 66 years later, we are exposed to radiation again".
News & Media
"We are exposed to the international reality," he said.
News & Media
We're exposed to far more audience than we would be on any other platform.
News & Media
Outfield production, he said, is the one area where "we're exposed a little bit".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we were exposed", ensure the context clearly indicates what "we" were exposed to. Specificity enhances clarity and impact.
Common error
Avoid using "we were exposed" without clarifying what the subject was exposed to. Failing to provide context leaves the reader guessing and weakens the statement.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were exposed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject ("we") underwent an experience or influence, often negative. Ludwig's examples showcase its use in diverse contexts, from physical exposure to radiation to metaphorical exposure of weaknesses.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Science
12%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Wiki
2%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we were exposed" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that a group has undergone a significant experience, often negative or revealing. According to Ludwig, it functions grammatically as a passive construction. While Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, context is crucial to ensure clarity about what the subject was exposed to. Occurring frequently in news and media, it's important to maintain a neutral tone and specify the source or cause of exposure. Consider alternatives like "we faced" or "we were subjected to" depending on the desired emphasis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were subjected to
This alternative emphasizes the experience of being acted upon, highlighting a lack of control over the situation.
we were vulnerable
This shifts the focus to the state of being susceptible to harm or negative influence, rather than the act of exposure itself.
we faced
This alternative replaces "exposed" with a verb indicating confrontation with a situation, focusing on the act of encountering something.
we encountered
This alternative is similar to "we faced" but suggests a more passive experience of coming across something.
we experienced
This is a more general term that indicates undergoing something, without specifying the nature of the experience as negative or dangerous.
we were open to
This suggests a state of receptiveness, either positive or negative, differing from the inherently negative connotation of "exposed".
we laid bare
This alternative emphasizes the action of revealing something about ourselves or a situation, suggesting vulnerability through disclosure.
we were revealed
This is emphasizing a process where something was uncovered about you.
we ran into
Using "ran into" suggests an element of chance or surprise in encountering something, making it a less direct substitute.
we came across
Similar to "ran into", this phrase emphasizes an accidental discovery or meeting, rather than a deliberate exposure or experience.
FAQs
What does "we were exposed" mean?
The phrase "we were exposed" generally means that a group of people were subjected to something, often something harmful or revealing. This could be a physical substance like radiation, or a situation that revealed a weakness or vulnerability.
What are some alternatives to "we were exposed"?
Depending on the specific context, you could use alternatives like "we faced", "we encountered", "we were subjected to", or "we were vulnerable".
Is it correct to say "we are exposed" instead of "we were exposed"?
Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have different meanings. "We were exposed" refers to a past event, while "we are exposed" describes a current state of vulnerability or risk.
What's the difference between "we were exposed to" and "we experienced"?
"We were exposed to" often implies an unwelcome or harmful experience, while "we experienced" is more neutral and can refer to positive or negative situations. For example, "we were exposed to radiation" versus "we experienced a cultural exchange".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested