Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we were being

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'we were being' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You would use it to express something that was happening in the past, for example, "We were being careful not to startle the wildlife."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

But we were being childish.

News & Media

The New Yorker

We were being followed, constantly.

News & Media

The New Yorker

We were being romantic.

We were being overrun".

News & Media

The New Yorker

This weapon we were being prodded with.

News & Media

The Guardian

We were being terrorized by robins.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

"We were were out at the time.

News & Media

BBC

we were, are, shall.

News & Media

Huffington Post

We're being tested.

News & Media

Independent

"We're being brave.

News & Media

The New York Times

We are being disrespected.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we were being", ensure the passive voice is appropriate and clearly identifies the actor performing the action. This makes the sentence more informative and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "we were being" excessively, as it can make your writing sound indirect and less engaging. In some cases, switching to the active voice can improve clarity and impact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we were being" functions as a passive construction indicating an action that was performed on the subject (“we”). This is based on the examples found by Ludwig, where “we” are the recipients of actions like “attacked”, “followed”, or “taught”. The Ludwig AI confirms that is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Academia

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we were being" is a very common passive voice construction used to describe a past action performed upon the subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely used, especially in news and media. The phrase implies that "we" were the recipients of an action, and it is important to use active voice to maintain the sentence informative and avoid ambiguity. While it's a useful construction, be mindful of overuse to keep your writing direct and engaging.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "we were being" to use active voice?

To switch from passive to active voice, identify the actor performing the action. For example, instead of "we were being followed", you could say "they followed us".

What does "we were being" imply in a sentence?

The phrase "we were being" indicates that the subject (we) was the recipient of an action, rather than the performer. This often implies an external force or influence.

Is there a difference between saying "we were" and "we were being"?

Yes. "We were" typically describes a state of being (e.g., "we were happy"), while "we were being" indicates an action being done to the subject (e.g., "we were being interviewed").

Which is more formal, "we were being" or an active voice alternative?

The formality depends on the context. While "we were being" isn't inherently informal, it can sometimes sound less direct than its active voice counterpart. Choose the option that best suits your desired tone and clarity.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: