Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we were appointed to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we were appointed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a formal assignment or designation to a position or role. Example: "After a thorough selection process, we were appointed to lead the new project team."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(19)
we were designated to
we were assigned to
we were tasked with
we were delegated to
we had the duty to
we were entrusted with
we were dispatched
we were given the task of
we were directed
we were tasked
we were assigned
we were ordered
we were recommended
we were spent
we were suspended
we were sold
we were instructed
we were charged with
we were sent
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
In August 1999, we were appointed to the independent National Commission on Terrorism, which Congress established after the embassy bombings in Africa to assess the growing threat against America.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
After all, the job we are appointed to do is to read the most highly charged advocacy for a particular position -- the briefs submitted by counsel for the parties before us -- and then choose among the competing interests consistent with our interpretation of the law.
News & Media
Two FPs were appointed to a region near us.
Science
"Despite all of the commitments, consultations, expert opinions, polling and campaigning, we are no closer to a referendum than we were when I was appointed to the expert panel in December 2010," he said.
News & Media
The letter warns: "Since we cannot take the oath of canonical obedience to a female bishop, we are unlikely to be appointed to future incumbencies.
News & Media
He is highly regarded by the selectors and we congratulate him on being appointed to the role on an ongoing basis.
News & Media
It says: "As was so successful with the Olympic and Paralympic Games, we want a dedicated minister to be appointed to lead regeneration and development around HS2 at the national level".
News & Media
We have no say on who is appointed to mercy and no say on who is appointed to wrath.
News & Media
Foreign preachers have been appointed to mosques.
News & Media
Heller was appointed to replace Ensign.
News & Media
In 1851, he was appointed to Brooklyn Naval Hospital.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we were appointed to", ensure clarity about the appointing authority and the specific role or task being assigned. This helps avoid ambiguity and provides context for the reader.
Common error
Avoid assuming that the audience understands the full extent of the appointment. Clearly outline the key responsibilities and objectives associated with the assigned role to manage expectations and prevent confusion.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we were appointed to" functions as a declarative statement indicating a formal assignment or designation. It specifies that a group ("we") has been officially chosen or assigned to a particular role, task, or position. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is a correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
25%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
15%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we were appointed to" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase for indicating a formal assignment or designation. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English. It's prevalent in contexts such as News & Media, Science, Wiki, and Encyclopedias, suggesting a neutral register that can lean towards professional depending on the source. When employing this phrase, it's important to ensure clarity regarding the appointing authority and the scope of the assigned role to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases, such as "we were designated to" or "we were assigned to", can be used as alternatives depending on the desired nuance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were designated to
Replaces "appointed" with "designated", implying a formal assignment.
we were assigned to
Substitutes "appointed" with "assigned", suggesting a task-oriented allocation.
we were selected for
Uses "selected" instead of "appointed", emphasizing a choice or preference.
we were chosen to
Similar to "selected", but with a slightly more informal tone.
we were named to
Replaces "appointed" with "named", suitable for official positions or roles.
we were tasked with
Focuses on the responsibility given rather than the formal appointment.
we were commissioned to
Suggests a formal request or authorization to perform a specific task.
we were delegated to
Implies that the task was handed down from a higher authority.
we were enrolled to
Change the original meaning to enroll in. For example: we were enrolled to the army.
we were enlisted to
Replaces "appointed" with "enlisted", often used when talking about being part of military actions or other similar things.
FAQs
How can I use "we were appointed to" in a sentence?
Use "we were appointed to" to indicate a formal assignment or designation for a specific role or task. For example, "We were appointed to lead the project team" or "We were appointed to investigate the matter".
What are some alternatives to "we were appointed to"?
You can use alternatives like "we were designated to", "we were assigned to", or "we were selected for" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "we were appointed to" or "we were selected to"?
Both "we were appointed to" and "we were selected to" are correct, but they have slightly different nuances. "Appointed" implies a formal assignment by an authority, while "selected" suggests a choice based on merit or suitability.
What is the difference between "we were appointed to" and "we were tasked with"?
"We were appointed to" suggests a formal designation to a role or position. "We were tasked with", on the other hand, emphasizes the responsibility given to perform a specific duty or task. For example, "We were appointed to the committee" versus "We were tasked with reviewing the proposal".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested