Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(55)
Perhaps other factors such as geographical access to healthcare are at play here, but the data we used did not allow us to explore this in any meaningful way.
The sources we used did not explicitly tell us every response an iPod would give us -- for example, mode switching was not well documented and we were not aware of its necessity.
Moreover, the administrative databases that we used did not contain data (laboratory and clinical data), which would have allowed us to determine illness severity (e.g., SOFA and APACHE scores).
Our main limitation in the speed of operation was that the particular webcam we used did not handle sharp movement well and took some time to refocus.
We found that fish oil addition, at the concentrations we used did not significantly (P > 0.05) affect shrimp growth, but there was significantly greater growth of male shrimp and higher astaxanthin concentration.
We tried to get some runs against it but the runs we used didn't work.
Similar(5)
This, unlike the first product we used, does not "dry".
For more individual activities, we use do.
We use do for more individual activities.
We use do to talk about an activity.
We use do when we talk about activities, particularly those related to work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com