The response papers that follow this case presentation suggest assessment and treatment plans that reflect the diverse theoretical leanings of the respondents.
Our data suggest assessment of the TGFβ-signalling cascade as an as yet unknown susceptibility factor.
Looking forward, we suggest that assessment of prediction uncertainty should be a standard part of any modelling project.
We suggest that assessment of carbon stocks of continental margin sediments within the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) of maritime nations may provide a useful framework for greenhouse gas emissions accounting, and for developing strategies for coastal carbon management as part of planning long-term responses to climate change.
We suggest precise assessment of stem antetorsion intraoperatively by means of computer navigation, preparing the femur first.
Therefore, we suggest that assessment of the viable tumour fraction would likely be a more accurate indicator of treatment response in neuroblastoma than necrosis alone.
We suggest that assessment of quality of care can be improved by including measures of therapy intensification and physician action in the face of uncontrolled values.
To counter these validity threats, we suggest that assessment should focus on generic process skills rather than the subjective content of reflection and where possible to consider objective information about the triggering situation to verify described reflections.
We suggest that assessment of tolerance vs. immunity to pre-immunocompetence transplants with graded degrees of antigenic mismatch, could provide a detailed insight into the number of self-antigens peripheral tolerance evolved to handle.
Based on the pattern of these associations, we suggest that assessment of comorbidity is a function of the outcome of interest, the population studied, and the different (subjective versus objective) aspects of comorbidity measured by each instrument.
For a perfect comparability of such reports the psychological assessment of donor candidates should be conducted in standardized steps as we suggest with our assessment procedure.
