Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we started to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we started to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the beginning of an action or process that involves a subsequent verb. Example: "After much discussion, we started to implement the new policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We started to sway.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We started to struggle".

News & Media

The New York Times

So we started to explore".

We started to be together".

And we started to sing.

News & Media

The Guardian

We started to fight.

News & Media

The New York Times

We started to barter.

News & Media

The Guardian

We started to hope.

We started to cry.

News & Media

The Guardian

"We started to burst at the seams".

"We started to wonder," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we started to" when you want to clearly indicate the beginning of an action or process. It's versatile and suitable for a wide range of contexts.

Common error

In formal contexts, avoid overusing "we started to". Consider more precise alternatives like "we initiated", "we commenced", or "we undertook" to maintain a professional tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we started to" functions primarily as a verb phrase indicating the initiation of an action. Ludwig AI confirms this by presenting numerous examples where this phrase introduces a subsequent verb, marking the beginning of a process or activity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

34%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we started to" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate the beginning of an action or process. Ludwig AI analysis shows its frequent use across diverse sources, particularly in news and media. While versatile, it's essential to consider the context and choose more formal alternatives when appropriate. To avoid overuse, writers should explore synonyms like "we began to" or "we commenced to". Overall, "we started to" is a reliable and widely understood phrase for expressing the initiation of an activity.

FAQs

What does "we started to" mean?

The phrase "we started to" indicates the beginning of an action, process, or state. It shows that a group of people (represented by "we") commenced doing something.

What can I say instead of "we started to"?

You can use alternatives like "we began to", "we commenced to", or "we initiated" depending on the context.

Is "we started to" formal or informal?

The phrase "we started to" is generally considered neutral in tone and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, in very formal writing, consider alternatives like "we commenced to" or "we undertook to".

How can I improve my writing using "we started to"?

To use "we started to" effectively, ensure that the verb following "to" accurately reflects the action or process that began. Avoid overuse by considering alternatives and varying your sentence structure.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: