Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Here, we simply define.
In this paper, we simply define it as motion task.
As discussed earlier, we simply define a quantity E l-h by subtracting the energy of the highest occupied orbital from that of the lowest unoccupied orbital.
From now on, however, we simply define TOA τ0 as the time it would take for an electromagnetic wave to travel the straight line that links the MS and AP, whether or not such a direct LOS path actually exists.
Thus, rather than declaring with absolute certainty that an example is incorrect or not, we simply define, so that the sample loss is now the probability that a mistake was made on example and we consider to be a random variable.
The exact meaning of mass defect at it pertains to mass spectrometry analysis has been reviewed in detail by Sleno et al. [5], however for this work we simply define the mass defect as the decimal numbers after the nominal mass.
Similar(48)
We simply defined low-skilled jobs as occupations that do not require any education at the university level and high-skilled jobs as occupations that do require a university degree.
We simply defined the joint kernel matrix K as: ∀ i, j : { D i, D j } ⊂ D, K ̂ i, j = K GEX ( D i, D j ) + K TAR ( D i, D j ) + K CHEM ( D i, D j ) 3. K ̂ was a 410×410 symmetric matrix representing our training set for the prediction of level 2 ATC codes.
Consequently, for protein matched sequences, we simply defined our p ij as: p ij = Pois (m ; λ ).
For the gene list, we simply defined it as a list of whole genes that includes not only transcription factors and co-factors but also non-transcription factors.
Actually adverse event e was noted in study A but not reported, which may lead to a different conclusion with comparison with study B. False results would be got if we simply defined complications in study A as n = 4. Maybe, in contrast, with the help of event e in study A, the final outcomes will stand on the opposite side.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com