In addition, we sought feedback about where nurses completed the survey, the number of sittings and length of time it took, and why participants that selected the print mode chose not to use the Web.
After drafting the survey, we sought feedback from 2 focus groups of US Feldenkrais Teachers.
Although we sought feedback from measure developers about our patient population and setting characterizations, we may have missed relevant information for some measures when developers did not respond.
We sought feedback from the DFCI Patient and Family Advisory Council about our materials (SICG, family guide, pre-visit letter, etc) through a series of meetings.
Following development of a draft model we sought feedback from stakeholders regarding the clarity of representation of the findings, and potential uses.
Following development of the model we sought feedback from stakeholders regarding the clarity of representation of the findings, and potential uses.
We sought feedback from participants who completed all or most of the programme and also from those who chose not to complete the programme.
We sought feedback about the framework from clinician and non-clinician caregiving experts to ensure that the revised framework portrayed mechanisms by which caregiving interventions affect caregiver and care recipient outcomes.
We sought feedback on the draft decision aid from two independent experts not involved in the project: a communication expert (researcher and journalist) and a clinical expert (oncologist and clinical epidemiologist).
After five rounds of interviews, we sought feedback on a draft questionnaire from seven colleagues with expertise in survey design, CAM research, research on chronic pain, and/or patient expectations.
