we recognized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we recognized with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a complete thought or meaning. Example: "We recognized with gratitude the efforts of our volunteers."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

An important issue we recognized with this approach is that semantics expressed in the information model and metadata may not be expressed in the ontology, or may contradict semantics expressed in the ontology.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

In its ruling, the appeals court said, "We recognize with some dismay that the proposed exemption may allow employers to reduce health benefits to retirees over the age of 65 while maintaining greater benefits for younger retirees".

The New York Times

3. We recognize with deep concern religious intolerance against certain religious communities, as well as the emergence of hostile acts and violence against such communities because of their religious beliefs and their racial or ethnic origin in various parts of the world which in particular limit their right to freely practice their belief.

The New York Times

It takes place in the everyday America we recognize, with many of the familiar trappings.

Huffington Post

"Today we recognize with this 3% in being that we will be the last defense to protect the citizens of the United States if there ever comes a day when our government takes up arms against the American people," the group states on its website.

Huffington Post

Jeffrey Osowski, state assistant education commissioner, said, "We tried to keep them open until the end of the school year, but we recognized that with a very large deficit, with staff leaving, it was in the best interest of the students to place them in their resident districts to try to salvage their school year".

The New York Times

We recognized that documents with layout C had subsections with a list element layout like "- AK: … - MK: …" while other documents did not.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

We recognized some limitations with this study.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

However, we recognized two problems with the contig when it was mapped to its closest relative, T. latifolia (Fig  1).

BMC Plant Biology

Additionally, we recognized that patients with UCI early after ART initiation might be different from those who interrupt later; our goal was to investigate predictors of the former.

BMC Infectious Diseases

We have been recognized with numerous awards annually by the New York Press Association, and our sports section has been No. 1 in the state for more than a decade.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "we recognized with", consider rephrasing to provide a clearer connection to what was recognized. For example, "we recognized the limitations with this approach" can be improved to "we recognized the limitations of this approach" or "we acknowledged the limitations with this approach".

Common error

The most common error is the incorrect use of the preposition "with" after "recognized". Typically, "recognized" should be followed by a direct object or the preposition "as" or "for", depending on the intended meaning. Avoid phrases like "we recognized with gratitude", and instead use "we acknowledged with gratitude".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we recognized with" is typically intended to express acknowledgement or awareness of something, often followed by an explanation of the context or consequence. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, this phrasing is not grammatically sound in standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we recognized with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI highlights its uncommon and unclear nature. Although the intent is often to convey acknowledgement or awareness, alternative phrasings like "we acknowledged with", "we recognized that", or variations using prepositions such as "as" or "for" are preferred. The phrase appears rarely, across Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business contexts. When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, it's best to opt for the recommended alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we acknowledged with

Emphasizes formal acknowledgement or acceptance, replacing 'recognized' with a more direct term.

we identified with

Implies a sense of connection or understanding, shifting the focus from recognition to empathy.

we noticed with

Highlights observation or awareness, suggesting a more passive form of recognition.

we observed with

Indicates careful and deliberate observation, adding a layer of scrutiny to the recognition.

we perceived with

Focuses on sensory or intuitive understanding, suggesting a deeper level of insight.

we understood with

Signifies comprehension or grasp of a concept, emphasizing intellectual recognition.

we discerned with

Implies careful distinction and recognition of subtle differences, adding a sense of precision.

we determined with

Highlights the process of reaching a conclusion or decision, shifting the focus to the outcome of recognition.

we ascertained with

Signifies the act of discovering something with certainty, emphasizing verification and confirmation.

we learned with

Focuses on the acquisition of knowledge or skill, changing the emphasis to the learning process.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "we recognized with" to improve clarity?

You can replace "we recognized with" with phrases like "we acknowledged with", "we identified with", or "we noticed with" depending on the intended meaning. For example, instead of "We recognized with deep concern", try "We acknowledged with deep concern".

What is a more grammatically correct alternative to "we recognized with"?

A more grammatically correct alternative would be to use "we recognized that" followed by a clause, or to replace "recognized with" with a more appropriate verb and preposition combination, such as "acknowledged with" or "identified with".

Is "we recognized with" considered standard English?

No, "we recognized with" is not considered standard English. The correct usage depends on the context, but alternatives like "we acknowledged with", "we recognized that", or simply "we recognized" are generally preferred.

What prepositions are commonly used with "recognized"?

The verb "recognized" is often followed by "as" (e.g., "recognized as a leader") or "for" (e.g., "recognized for his contributions"). It can also be followed by "that" to introduce a clause. Using "with" after "recognized" is generally incorrect.