we re short of

USAGE SUMMARY

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

We re-ran the final short version on this sample.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

These tags form part of the meta data Gotuit uses to index and search through movies, making it possible to easily re-order short clips of long videos on demand.

TechCrunch

Re "Nader Falls Short of the 5% Needed for the Green Party to Get Federal Campaign Funds" (news article, Nov. 8): Blaming Ralph Nader for Al Gore's electoral woes is as unseemly as it is delusory.

The New York Times

About 13,000 of its voters migrated to the Alternative, causing the NPD to fall 809 votes short of re-entering the Saxon parliament.

The Economist

Advocaat's challenge now is to re-model a team woefully short of invention, attacking incision, pace, power, height and, arguably most alarming of all, sustained industry.

The Guardian - Sport

Senator Robert G. Torricelli, the New Jersey Democrat who last year managed his party's Senate re-election effort, stopped short of saying how he would vote on the bill.

The New York Times

Which is why it's very possible to imagine him making all the right promises and taking all the right positions over the next 14 months and still falling short of re-election.

The New York Times

However, it has stopped short of re-introducing league tables which were scrapped in Wales in 2001.

BBC

Mr Andrews has previously announced plans for a system of grading schools, but insists it will stop short of re-introducing league tables.

BBC

Speaking to the Today programme, Jeremy Oliver, Melbourne-based wine critic and author of the Australian Wine Annual guide, explained: "The Australian wine industry has been desperately short of re-investment over the last decade.

BBC

Re-read short selections of text.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we re short of", ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking. This avoids ambiguity and ensures your message is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "we re short of" in highly formal or professional communications. While acceptable, more formal alternatives like "we lack" or "we have a deficit of" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we re short of" primarily functions as a statement indicating a deficiency or lack. It conveys that a required amount or quantity is not currently available or sufficient. Ludwig AI confirms that it follows standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we re short of" is a grammatically sound and neutrally registered expression used to indicate a deficiency or lack of something. Although Ludwig AI considers it correct, due to its lack of examples in the current dataset, it is classified as having "Missing" frequency. While more formal alternatives exist, it is widely understandable. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in the context to avoid ambiguity. Consider more formal options like "we lack" in professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we need more

A simpler and more direct expression of the need for more.

we lack

Directly indicates a deficiency; more concise.

we are low on

Abbreviated version of "we are running low on".

we don't have enough

A more straightforward and common way to express a shortage.

we are lacking in

Emphasizes the area of deficiency more explicitly.

we are deficient in

A more formal way to express a lack, especially in technical contexts.

we are running low on

Implies a depletion of a supply.

we have a deficit of

Suggests a formal accounting or budget context.

our resources are insufficient

Highlights the inadequacy of resources.

our supply is limited

Highlights the limited nature of the available supply.

FAQs

What does "we re short of" mean?

The phrase "we re short of" means that there is not enough of something. It indicates a deficiency or a lack of sufficient resources, supplies, or other necessary items.

How to use "we re short of" in a sentence?

You can use "we re short of" to indicate a current need or deficiency. For example, "we re short of staff" or "we re short of funds".

What can I say instead of "we re short of"?

You can use alternatives like "we lack", "we don't have enough", or "we need more" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "we re short of" or "we are short on"?

Both "we re short of" and "we are short on" are acceptable. "We re short of" generally refers to a deficiency in a more abstract sense, while "we are short on" often refers to physical items or time. But these are subtle differences and can be often used interchangeably.