Like my predecessor William Safire, I prefer defining acronym as "a pronounceable word created out of the initials or major parts of a compound term, like NATO, radar or TriBeCa".
I would prefer defining FUE as a genomic unit encoding protein, protein domain, structural or regulatory RNA, or a control element with independent evolutionary history.
In order to assign more flexibility to the method, that is to assure better generalization capabilities, we prefer to define a local model involving the L11−12 fragments of all the matched patterns. .
Second, we prefer to define the conformity without reference to the diagonal elements a ii of the adjacency matrix.
Thus, we prefer to define the accessions by their functionality at each locus which better reflects the GSL profile differences observed.
As we have argued previously [ 6], we prefer to define this disorder on the basis of its clinical appearance as a movement disorder that is significantly altered by distraction or nonphysiological manoeuvres (including dramatic placebo response) and which is clinically incongruent with movement disorders known to be caused by neurological disease.
To avoid having different lipophilicities reflecting composition variability of biological nonpolar phases, we prefer to define lipophilicity as the core/water partition coefficient for a saturated PC, which should be properly parametrized by the hexadecane (C16 /water partition coefficient (section ), according to eq 1 in section.
Consistent with others [ 8, 35], we prefer to define polypharmacy specifically as the use of 5 or more medications in a medication regimen, since this threshold has been consistently associated with important negative health outcomes [ 36] and is supported by empiric work [ 37].
However, we prefer to define the conformity as a maximizer of the factorizability function F A (v ) = 1 − ∑ i ∑ j ≠ i (a i j − v i v j ) 2 ∑ i ∑ j ≠ i (a i j ) 2 for the following reasons: First, the factorizability satisfies that F A (CF ) = 1 if, and only if, A is exactly factorizable network with a ij = CF i CF j.
However, these authors defined the response to fluid challenge as an increase in descending aortic blood flow evaluated by esophageal Doppler, which is thus a systemic response to fluid challenge, while we preferred to define the response to fluids as an increase in urine output.
