Based on this functional literature, we predicted to find morphological differences in a network comprised by parietal and frontal areas and especially the occipito-temporal junction (OTJ), fusiform gyrus, and caudate nucleus.
We predicted to find activation beyond those areas known to support number processing i.e., the intraparietal region.
According to these calculations we predicted to find one ovarian cancer, which was subsequently observed.
Given the limited evidence for vocal learning in nonhuman primates (Hammerschmidt and Fischer 2008), we predicted to find little variation between and no variation within species.
Third, since males were expected to demonstrate larger physiological stress-reactivity as indicated by cardiovascular and HPA axis indices [ 27– 29], we predicted to find more between-group differences for males than for females.
Populations connected by high levels of gene flow are less likely to be locally adapted than isolated populations, and so we would predict to find coldspots in areas of high gene flow and hotspots in areas of restricted gene flow.
For instance, if laying eggs into yucca flowers requires a particular complement of ovipositor traits and moth behaviors, we might predict to find host switches only between closely related yuccas.
People who are not experts in the psychology of expertise are likely (I predict) to find Tetlock's results a surprise and a matter for concern.
We predict and find that quality-differentiated leadership improves the mental representations of fraud risk for seniors, but not managers.
For each TF or TC protein we predicted, we used BLASTP to find its best ortholog in other species, i.e., the E-value of the best high-scoring segment pair (HSP) should be smaller than 1e-20 and the length of subsequence included in the HSP in both sequences must occupy at least 30% of the total length in both sequences.
