Sentence examples for we originally submitted from inspiring English sources
The phrase "we originally submitted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a previous submission or document that was provided at an earlier time. Example: "In our last correspondence, we originally submitted the proposal for your review."
We originally submitted a short Correspondence of our findings to the high profile journal that published the Kiriakidou et al paper[ 1].
In the manuscript we originally submitted, we used the term satiation to refer to the successful termination of a mating bout.
A recent study published after we had originally submitted this manuscript similarly suggests that oncogenic RAS-driven autophagy dependence is context dependent, since in the absence of TP53, autophagy is no longer required for RAS-mediated tumor growth and progression, and the absence of autophagy may actually accelerate these in RAS-driven tumors where TP53 has been deleted.
In the originally submitted manuscript, we explicitly mention "induced or repressed genes".
We discuss this in our originally submitted manuscript, and now in the revised manuscript.
It was originally submitted in wave format Submitted by Brian Gygi ([email protected]) Recording details Type of equipment used N/A Distance from the source N/A Recording environment N/A Recording date/time N/A Recording level (SPL) N/A Usage history Citation Gygi, B.: Parsing the Blooming Buzzing Confusion: Identifying Natural Auditory Scenes.
We had considered that pH might influence different stages of the reaction, and in the originally submitted version of the work, we chose to build in a pH-dependence for the initial dimer dissociation step.
We even discuss this issue in the originally submitted manuscript, explaining that the effect of RNAi alone leads to a larger number of differentially regulated genes after infection.
Only outline applications were included in this study as we wished to examine the applications as they were originally submitted by the researchers, before input from the board, to gain insight into which characteristics are predictive of success.
We did not have suitable numbers of E15.5 Nrp2 +/- cochleae to add to the data so we have left this data in the form that was originally submitted.
Instead, we retain these kinds of data in the format in which they are originally submitted (e.g. WIG and SAM), and reference them from the database.
