we met with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we met with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a meeting that happened in the past. For example: "We met with the CEO to discuss our plans for the new project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

We met with Mao.

The New Yorker

We met with Stalin.

The New Yorker

We met with Impala several times.

The New York Times

We met with every club.

The New York Times - Sports

"We met with them recently.

The Guardian - Tech

We met with [producer] Buddy Cannon.

The Guardian - Music

"We met with them several times.

The New York Times

"We met with big high schools, we met with small high schools," Mr. Liebman said.

The New York Times

Everyone we met with recalled Capote and Lee quite vividly.

The Guardian - Books

We met with three consultants and two doctors.

The New Yorker

PIANO -- We met with Richard Rogers -- it was a competition.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we met with", ensure the context clearly indicates the purpose or outcome of the meeting for better clarity.

Common error

Avoid using phrases like "we met together with" as the "together" is already implied in "we met with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we met with" functions as a verb phrase indicating a past interaction or encounter, typically for a specific purpose. It emphasizes the act of meeting and engaging in discussion or consultation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we met with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe a past encounter or meeting, as confirmed by Ludwig. It functions primarily to report past interactions and is versatile enough for news, professional, and some informal settings. Alternatives like "we spoke with" or "we consulted with" can add nuance, but it's essential to avoid redundant phrasing for clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we had a meeting with

Emphasizes the occurrence of a formal meeting.

we had discussions with

Highlights multiple conversation or debate.

we spoke with

Focuses on the act of speaking and conversation.

we engaged with

Focuses on active participation and interaction.

we consulted with

Highlights seeking advice or guidance.

we conferred with

Suggests a formal discussion to reach an agreement.

we convened with

Implies a formal or official gathering.

we interviewed

Implies a structured question and answer session.

we gathered with

Emphasizes the act of coming together as a group.

we touched base with

Indicates a brief check-in or update.

FAQs

How to use "we met with" in a sentence?

Use "we met with" to describe a past meeting or encounter. For example, "We met with the team to discuss the project's progress."

What can I say instead of "we met with"?

You can use alternatives like "we spoke with", "we consulted with", or "we had a meeting with" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "we met with" or "we meet with"?

"We met with" is the past tense, used for completed meetings. "We meet with" is present tense, used for regularly scheduled meetings or future arrangements.

What's the difference between "we met with" and "we met"?

"We met with" implies a specific purpose or discussion with someone, while "we met" simply indicates an encounter. For example, "We met John" versus "We met with John to discuss the proposal."