Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we met
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'we met' is a perfectly valid and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You could use it in a sentence like, "We met last week and now I'm looking forward to seeing her again."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
we encountered
we got acquainted
a session was held
we held a meeting
we convened a meeting
we have encountered
we convened
we meet
they faced
we attended a meeting
we satisfied with
we conducted a meeting
we meet with
we had meeting
a meeting took place
our paths crossed
we encountered each other
we had breakfast
we were introduced
we connected with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Have We Met? Have we met?
News & Media
We met.
News & Media
We met once.
News & Media
We met online.
News & Media
We met the moment".
News & Media
We met in Austria.
News & Media
"Have we met?
News & Media
We met on set.
News & Media
Tim said: "We met before.
News & Media
Everyone we met was friendly.
News & Media
We met Josie's amazing familia!!!
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing how you met someone, provide additional context such as the place, event, or mutual acquaintance involved.
Common error
Ensure that the context makes it clear who "we" refers to. Avoid using "we met" in situations where the reader might not know who is included in the "we".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we met" serves as an intransitive verb phrase, indicating a past encounter between two or more people. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.
Frequent in
News & Media
98%
Formal & Business
1%
Academia
1%
Less common in
Science
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we met" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe a past encounter. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. It functions as an intransitive verb phrase with a neutral register, making it appropriate for various contexts, particularly in news and media. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by providing context about the circumstances of the meeting. Alternatives such as "we encountered each other" or "we were introduced" can offer nuanced meanings depending on the specific situation.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we encountered
A more concise alternative to 'we encountered each other'.
we encountered each other
Replaces "met" with "encountered", suggesting a chance or unexpected meeting.
we came across one another
Similar to "encountered", this emphasizes the accidental nature of the meeting.
we were introduced
Specifies that the meeting involved an introduction, implying a more formal setting.
we had an introduction
Similar to "we were introduced", but phrased as an action.
our paths crossed
A more metaphorical way of saying "we met", suggesting destiny or fate.
we got acquainted
Suggests the meeting led to a degree of familiarity or friendship.
we made contact
Focuses on the initial establishment of communication or connection.
we convened
Implies a planned or organized meeting, often for a specific purpose.
I was introduced to them
Shifts the focus to the speaker being introduced rather than a mutual meeting.
FAQs
How can I use "we met" in a sentence?
You can use "we met" to describe a past encounter, such as "We met at a conference last year" or "We met through a mutual friend".
What are some alternatives to saying "we met"?
Alternatives include "we encountered each other", "we were introduced", or "our paths crossed", depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "we have met" instead of "we met"?
Both are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "We met" refers to a specific past event, while "we have met" implies that you have encountered each other at some point in the past, without specifying when.
What is the difference between "we met" and "we were introduced"?
"We met" is a general term for encountering someone. "We were introduced" specifies that a third party facilitated the meeting.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested