Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we made reference to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we made reference to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that you have mentioned or alluded to something previously in your writing or conversation. Example: "In our previous discussion, we made reference to the importance of sustainable practices in our industry."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
To chose the window of time most appropriate to study craniofacial malformations we made reference to previous reports.
Science
As regards PINc domain, we made reference to human SMG6PINc which has RNAse activity and it is composed of alternating beta-sheets and alpha-helices.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
We make reference to that.
News & Media
And so, in fact, if we make reference to duality, there isn't duality in the continuous-time Fourier series.
Throughout the report, we make reference to studies of several other languages in an attempt to situate Spanish within cross-linguistic research on question-response sequences.
Science
"In fact," he said, "I'd suggest we make reference to the proposed exchange of information, if that's what we're doing, to help explain some of our notions of reciprocal altruism".
News & Media
We make reference to producing regions involved in the international trade of liquefied natural gas.
Science
"In addition, in this study we make reference to previous studies in humans, which show that light does, indeed, impact the human brain's limbic system.
Academia
We make reference to chemiluminescence, because the type of luminescence applied to immunoassay techniques generally identifies exergonic chemical reactions as the most suitable energy source for producing the electronic excited state.
Science
"In addition, in this study, we make reference to previous studies on humans, which show that light does, indeed, impact the human brain's limbic system.
News & Media
In the film we make reference to the genocide that happened and the internal conflict that was, in great measure, sparked or upheld by US foreign policy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "we made reference to" to formally acknowledge a prior mention or source, ensuring clarity and context for your audience. It's particularly useful in academic or professional writing.
Common error
Avoid using "we made reference to" in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "we mentioned" or "we talked about" are often more appropriate.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we made reference to" functions as a reporting verb phrase, indicating that the speakers or writers are drawing attention to something previously mentioned or known. Ludwig AI confirms it's usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
35%
News & Media
25%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we made reference to" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression for indicating a previous mention or citation. According to Ludwig AI, it is usable in written English, and examples show its prevalence across diverse sources, including Science, News & Media, Academia, and Formal & Business settings. While versatile, it is most appropriate in neutral to formal contexts. For less formal communication, alternatives like "we mentioned" or "we referred to" might be more suitable.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we referred to
A more direct and common alternative, indicating a specific mention.
we mentioned
A simpler and more straightforward way of saying something was brought up.
we alluded to
Implies a less direct mention, suggesting a hint or indirect reference.
we cited
Indicates a formal reference, usually to a source of information.
we touched upon
Suggests a brief or superficial mention of a topic.
we pointed out
Highlights a specific detail or fact.
we called attention to
Emphasizes bringing something to notice.
we drew attention to
Similar to 'called attention to', but can also imply discovery or uncovering.
we spoke of
Indicates a general discussion about something.
we hinted at
Suggests an indirect and subtle reference.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "we made reference to"?
You can use alternatives like "we referred to", "we mentioned", or "we alluded to" depending on the context.
How do I use "we made reference to" in a sentence?
This phrase is used to indicate a previous mention or discussion of something. For example: "In our report, we made reference to several key studies."
Is "we made reference to" formal or informal?
The phrase "we made reference to" leans towards being formal. In less formal contexts, phrases like "we mentioned" or "we talked about" might be more suitable.
What's the difference between "we made reference to" and "we referred to"?
"We referred to" is a more direct and straightforward way of saying that you mentioned something. "We made reference to" can sometimes imply a less direct or more subtle connection.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested