Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
However, it seems the jury is still out on the science behind vitamins tailored to your genetics and, like Trabelsi mentioned earlier, we likely need a lot more study on the matter.
In the end, though, we likely need more data and time to make any definitive judgments.
Ultimately, we likely need a fundamentally new network architecture - one that can dynamically multicast and cache multiple video feeds close to consumers and then perform advanced video processing within the network to construct individualized views.
She added that this means we likely need more crossover discussion between this community and those making policy decisions, and Hwang added that currently, there's "no good way for the public at large to signal" what moral choices should be made around the direction of AI development.
In other words, we likely need a literary genius to light the path for us, but she must, in time, find a large and credible following or else risk irrelevance--as did Pound when he chose a fascist radio program as the vehicle for his wisdom.
With >1 SNP/scaffold, we likely need at least 5× coverage per potentially heterozygous recombinant individual (e.g., F2 individual) to accomplish accurate genome construction.
Similar(53)
AriX, if you're reading this, get some rest, we'll likely need your ninja-like coding skills pretty soon.
Atwater: Though we will start with known light-absorbing and catalytic materials, we will likely need to invent new materials because the materials we have now don't have the ideal properties.
Piper Jaffray said that based on shipment timing of version 10.4 of Mac OS X, or Tiger, "we believe our June quarter software segment estimate is too low and we will likely need to add around 2% to our overall Apple revenue estimate for June".
We will likely need a suite of spokes-people!
We most likely need to reconsider the identification of crucial implementation drivers in the public realm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com