Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we lacked

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we lacked" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a deficiency or absence of something in a particular context. Example: "During the project, we lacked the necessary resources to complete it on time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Offensively we lacked aggressiveness.

News & Media

Independent

We lacked that.

News & Media

The New York Times

'We lacked quality, we lacked belief.

We lacked nothing".

News & Media

The New York Times

We lacked verticality".

"We lacked composure.

We lacked all these attributes".

And apparently we lacked that.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We lacked effectiveness," conceded Roura.

"We lacked mobility and precision.

News & Media

Independent

We lacked size last year.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we lacked" to clearly and concisely state a deficiency or absence. It's suitable for describing shortcomings in resources, qualities, or actions.

Common error

While "we lacked" is generally acceptable, overuse in formal reports or academic papers can sound repetitive. Vary your language by using synonyms like "we were deficient in" or "we did not possess" to maintain a professional tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we lacked" functions as a statement of deficiency. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and usable. It's used to express that a certain quality, resource, or attribute was absent or insufficient.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we lacked" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a deficiency or absence. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly in news and media, where it serves to explain shortcomings or analyze past events. While versatile, it's advisable to vary the language in highly formal contexts to avoid repetition. Consider alternatives like "we were missing" or "we did not have" to enhance stylistic variation.

FAQs

How can I use "we lacked" in a sentence?

Use "we lacked" to indicate a deficiency or absence of something. For example, "We lacked the necessary funding to complete the project."

What can I say instead of "we lacked"?

You can use alternatives like "we were missing", "we did not have", or "we were deficient in" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "we lacked of"?

No, the correct phrasing is "we lacked". The preposition "of" is not needed after "lacked".

What is the difference between "we lacked" and "we missed"?

"We lacked" implies a deficiency or absence of something needed, while "we missed" suggests failing to experience or obtain something. For example, "We lacked resources" vs. "We missed the opportunity".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: