Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we involved
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we involved" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that "we were involved" or "we have involved ourselves," depending on the context. Example: "In the project, we involved various stakeholders to ensure diverse perspectives were considered."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We involved purposively only GPs without inviting patients and pharmacists as the involvement could artificially enhance the effectiveness of the pilot study.
Science
"We involved the whole office.
News & Media
"We started early and we involved a lot of community".
News & Media
At no time were we involved in discussions about a permanent tower to be put up".
News & Media
Answer this for me, maestro: are we involved in musical theatre?
News & Media
'We involved community leaders and shop owners from the start, checked that that was what they wanted.
News & Media
To make the film as participatory and authentic as possible, we involved the girls in every step of the process.
News & Media
And we involved senior stakeholders in the sector to gauge their reaction and gain further insight and knowledge.
News & Media
We involved the children in shaping every aspect of the lunchtime experience, down to choosing the right kind of knife and fork.
News & Media
"I figured no one would come in just for me — I thought we'd interest more customers if we involved some big names".
News & Media
According to Facebook's own stats, 460 people we involved in building the Altoona 1 data center.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct past tense or past participle form such as "we were involved" or "we have involved". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.
Common error
A common mistake is to omit auxiliary verbs like 'were' or 'have' before 'involved'. Always include the necessary auxiliary verb to maintain correct grammar. For example, use "we were involved" instead of the incorrect "we involved".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we involved" functions incorrectly as a verb phrase because it lacks the necessary auxiliary verb to form a correct past tense or past participle construction. Ludwig AI highlights that the phrase is not grammatically correct in standard written English.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "we involved" appears frequently across different sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct forms are "we were involved" or "we have involved", depending on the intended meaning. Usage spans across science, news, and business contexts, yet its incorrectness limits its appropriateness for formal settings. Therefore, always ensure the inclusion of auxiliary verbs to maintain grammatical accuracy. Choosing alternatives like "we participated" or "we engaged" can also provide clarity and correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we were involved
Uses the correct past tense passive voice construction to indicate participation or inclusion.
we participated
Replaces "involved" with a verb that explicitly conveys active participation.
we engaged
Similar to 'participated', this highlights active engagement in a process or activity.
we included
Focuses on the act of adding or incorporating something or someone into a group or process.
we incorporated
Suggests a more formal or structural integration of elements.
we enlisted
Implies a more active effort to recruit or bring someone into an activity.
we brought in
Informal way to say "we involved", often suggesting bringing in external resources or people.
we drew in
Similar to 'brought in', suggests attracting or pulling someone into an activity.
we had a hand in
Indicates some level of participation or influence in an activity or process.
we took part in
Another way of saying "we participated", emphasizing the act of being part of something.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "we involved" in a sentence?
The phrase "we involved" is grammatically incorrect. Use "we were involved" to indicate participation or "we have involved" to indicate that you initiated the involvement of others.
What can I say instead of "we involved"?
Alternatives include "we were involved", "we participated", or "we engaged", depending on the context.
Which is correct, "we involved" or "we were involved"?
"We were involved" is the grammatically correct option. "We involved" is missing the auxiliary verb "were".
What's the difference between "we involved" and "we have involved"?
"We involved" is grammatically incorrect. "We have involved" indicates that you initiated the involvement of others, whereas "we were involved" indicates that you participated in something.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested