But what there is a shortage of is a diagnostic of Trump Dynamics - analyzing the way he operates so that we can best understand why he has run his campaign the way he has so far, and, more importantly, how we should interpret him so that we can best assess how Donald Trump could be as President of the United States.
And we can interpret him in this way even if he himself would not have asserted it.
One can interpret Berkeley as implying that there is more to the self than introspection can capture, or we can interpret him as saying that notions, though presenting stranger entities than ideas, capture them just as totally.
Thus, the later Harclay, as we are interpreting him, is a reductive realist he not only rejects the existence of sui generis relational properties, but maintains that in paradigmatic relational situations, substances are related by their ordinary, non-relational accidents.
When for example Nishida writes "absolute nothingness transcends all that is, but at the same time all that is arises through it" (NKZ IX, 6), we may interpret him as pointing to an undifferentiated source beyond the distinctions it gives rise to, a source that is necessarily entailed by their being brought together precisely as distinct from one another.
We're all trying to interpret him, but he is also trying to interpret us.
"I think the two best ways to reflect him, so we don't begin to interpret him in a way in which he really didn't intend," Mr. Giuliani said, "is to, No. 1, to read what he said rather than what other people have to say about it, and No. 2, to pray, because I think that's the thing that he would tell us to do.
As a result, people interpret him in their own ways.
"We interpreted that as his first stump speech," James said.
So this year, we interpreted Easter Sunday a little differently.... enjoy!
