we have reduced

USAGE SUMMARY

'we have reduced' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express that a quantity has been decreased, for example, "We have reduced our energy output by 10%".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We have reduced overtime.

The New York Times

But we have reduced it.

The New York Times - Science

We have reduced the size of the county auto fleet.

The New York Times

"Given the strong cash generation over the year, we have reduced our debt levels significantly.

The Guardian - Business

"By going into both markets, we have reduced risk for the business.

The Guardian - Business

Hence, we have reduced our target price to 1718p (from 1751p) to reflect the continuing weakness.

The Guardian - Business

"We have reduced our work force by about 1,000 employees.

The New York Times

"We have reduced her activism to this celebratory tale — 'It was all great,' " he told me.

The New Yorker

We have reduced Islam to the organized hypocrisy of state-sponsored mullahism.

The New York Times

We have reduced the amount of rental space the county pays for.

The New York Times

We have reduced to a bare minimum all equipment, travel and educational training accounts.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we have reduced", ensure that the context clearly indicates what has been reduced and by how much, providing specific details for clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid using "we have reduced" without specifying what was reduced. For instance, instead of saying "we have reduced costs", specify "we have reduced operational costs by 15%"

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we have reduced" functions as a declarative statement indicating a completed action of decreasing something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and usable. The phrase highlights a result achieved, as seen in examples like "We have reduced overtime."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we have reduced" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that conveys a completed action of decreasing something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity for written English, particularly in contexts like news, business, and academia. The phrase is best used with specific details about what has been reduced to avoid vagueness and ensure clarity. Alternative phrasing options include "we have decreased" or "we have lowered", depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we have decreased

A more formal and neutral term for reducing.

we have lowered

Focuses on a decrease in level or amount.

we have slashed

Emphasizes a significant and abrupt reduction.

we have minimized

Focuses on reducing something to the smallest possible amount.

we have cut back

Suggests a deliberate reduction, often in spending or resources.

we have lessened

Suggests a gradual or moderate decrease.

we have curtailed

Implies a restriction or limitation, leading to a reduction.

we have downsized

Often used in the context of reducing the size of a company or workforce.

we have diminished

Implies a reduction to insignificance.

we have trimmed

Suggests a slight or careful reduction.

FAQs

How can I use "we have reduced" in a sentence?

Use "we have reduced" to indicate a decrease in something. For example, "We have reduced our carbon footprint" or "We have reduced the price."

What are some alternatives to "we have reduced"?

Consider using phrases like "we have decreased", "we have lowered", or "we have cut back" as alternatives, depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "we have reduced" or "we reduced"?

"We have reduced" (present perfect) emphasizes the current state resulting from a past action, while "we reduced" (simple past) simply states a past action. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the present relevance of the reduction.

What's the difference between "we have reduced" and "we are reducing"?

"We have reduced" indicates that the reduction is complete, whereas "we are reducing" implies an ongoing process. For example, "we have reduced emissions" suggests the target has been achieved, while "we are reducing emissions" indicates ongoing efforts.