Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we have met
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we have met" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that two people have previously encountered each other, often in a context of recognition or familiarity. Example: "I believe we have met at the conference last year, and I enjoyed our conversation."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
We have met Max before.
News & Media
We have met him.
News & Media
"We have met and discussed musical aspects.
News & Media
We have met him before.
News & Media
We have met all the Requirements..
News & Media
We have met all the Requirements...
News & Media
We have met previously and that helped.
News & Media
We have met Zimmer before, briefly.
News & Media
"It is the first time we have met him".
News & Media
"We have met the enemy and they are ours".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
O'Driscoll added: "They have done a job on us the last three times [we have met].
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase, ensure the context clarifies whether the meeting was brief or significant, adding details if necessary to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "we meet" when referring to a past encounter. "We meet" suggests a planned or scheduled meeting in the future, while "we have met" correctly indicates a prior meeting.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we have met" functions as an acknowledgment of a prior encounter. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in various contexts. It serves to establish a shared experience between individuals.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Science
13%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "we have met" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to acknowledge a previous encounter. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's suitable for various contexts, including News & Media, Science and Formal & Business settings. While similar phrases like "we encountered each other" or "we crossed paths" exist, "we have met" is a direct and versatile choice. Remember to use "we have met" to refer to prior meetings, avoiding confusion with future-tense phrases like "we meet". Overall it is a reliable and effective way to acknowledge shared history between individuals.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we encountered each other
Focuses on the action of encountering, rather than the state of having met.
we crossed paths
Implies a brief or incidental meeting.
our paths have crossed
Similar to 'we crossed paths' but emphasizes the paths themselves.
we've been introduced
Highlights the formal act of introduction.
we've made acquaintance
A more formal way of saying we have met.
we know each other
Indicates familiarity resulting from prior meetings.
we are acquainted
A formal way to express familiarity.
we've seen each other before
Emphasizes the visual recognition.
we were introduced previously
More formal and emphasizes the prior introduction.
we share a past connection
Highlights a shared history or relationship.
FAQs
How can I politely indicate that "we have met" before?
You can say "I believe "we have met before", haven't we?" or "I think we've met."
What does "we have met" imply?
It implies that both individuals have encountered each other at some point in the past, regardless of how brief or significant the meeting was.
Which is more formal, "we have met" or "we know each other"?
"We have met" is generally less formal than "we know each other", which suggests a degree of familiarity beyond a single meeting.
Is it correct to say "we have met already"?
Yes, it is correct. Adding "already" emphasizes that the meeting occurred sometime before the current moment and is complete. For example: "Yes, "we've already met" at the conference last week."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested