we have heard

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we have heard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that you have received information or news about something, often in a formal or reporting context. Example: "We have heard from several sources that the project deadline has been extended."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

We have heard this before.

The Economist

"We have heard everything.

The New York Times - Sports

We have heard you.

The Guardian

Unfortunately, we have heard that threat before.

The New Yorker

What might we have heard from her?

The New York Times - Magazine

"We have heard this story before.

The New York Times

We have heard this line before.

The New York Times - Sports

We have heard all the rhetoric before.

The New York Times

We have heard reports of looting.

The New Yorker

We have heard all those promises before.

The New York Times

We have heard this tune before.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we have heard", ensure the context clearly indicates the source of the information, especially in formal writing. This adds credibility and allows readers to evaluate the information's reliability.

Common error

Avoid using "we have heard" without specifying the source, as it can make your statement sound like hearsay. Always provide context or attribution to enhance trustworthiness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we have heard" primarily functions as a reporting verb phrase. It introduces information that has been received, often from external sources. As demonstrated by Ludwig, this phrase indicates the reception of news, reports, or opinions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

92%

Science

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we have heard" is a versatile phrase used to report information, news, or opinions received from various sources. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly in news and media contexts. While the phrase is generally neutral in tone, it's crucial to provide context and attribute sources for enhanced credibility. Alternatives like "we understand" or "we've been told" can offer slightly different nuances depending on the specific situation. By following best practices and avoiding vague sourcing, writers can effectively utilize "we have heard" in their communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we're aware

Highlights consciousness or knowledge about a particular fact or situation.

we understand

Indicates comprehension or acknowledgment of a statement or situation, rather than a simple reception of information.

we've learned

Focuses on the acquisition of knowledge, implying an educational or informative aspect.

we've been told

Emphasizes the act of being informed by someone, highlighting the source of the information.

we're informed

Suggests being officially notified or updated about a particular matter.

we acknowledge

Implies recognition and acceptance of something, often a statement or situation.

it has come to our attention

Suggests a more formal or official manner of receiving information, often regarding something important.

we've received reports

Specifically refers to the receipt of formal reports or updates, implying a structured information flow.

we are apprised

A more formal synonym for 'informed', suggesting official communication.

we've noticed

Focuses on information gained through observation, rather than direct communication.

FAQs

How can I use "we have heard" in a sentence?

You can use "we have heard" to introduce information received from others, as in "We have heard reports of a possible merger" or "We have heard concerns regarding the new policy".

What are some alternatives to "we have heard"?

Alternatives include "we understand", "we've been told", or "it has come to our attention", depending on the context and level of formality.

Is it better to say "we have heard" or "we heard"?

"We have heard" typically implies a more recent or ongoing reception of information, while "we heard" suggests a completed action in the past. The best choice depends on the intended nuance and context.

When is it appropriate to use "we have heard" in formal writing?

It's appropriate in formal writing when you need to convey that information has been received, but it's important to provide context and attribute the source when possible to maintain credibility.