we have errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we have errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that there are mistakes or issues present in a particular context, such as a report, document, or system. Example: "After reviewing the data, we have errors that need to be addressed before finalizing the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

And we have hits and we have errors.

The New York Times

"We have errors," he acknowledges.

Science Magazine

We have errors in the measured and.

Boundary Value Problems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

An unexpected consequence of teaching this course has been the discovery of the number of modeling papers that have errors, which we have found consistently in every semester.

CBE Life Sciences Education

In the current work, we have evaluated error-free and error-prone TLS of S-cdA in E. coli.

Chemical Research in Toxicology

There is, of course, no way to always avoid both types of error, and we have different error thresholds in different endeavours.

The Guardian

Two case studies are reviewed, in which we have found errors that were previously not detected.

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Taking a typical experiment from Cunningham and Wolfe (2014), we have 4% errors with a 2% standard deviation.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

"We aren't perfect and we have made errors of omission, but we never intended to mislead anybody".

Huffington Post

We have corrected errors concerning the terms PNH Types I, II and III.

F1000Research

We observed that MMC had errors larger than the other three simulators.

Biomedical Optics Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When admitting to "we have errors", follow up immediately with steps you are taking to correct them. This demonstrates accountability and proactivity.

Common error

Avoid simply stating "we have errors" without providing specific details or examples of the errors. This can lead to confusion and a lack of understanding of the scope of the problem.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we have errors" functions as a declarative statement. It indicates the presence of mistakes or inaccuracies. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable. This is supported by the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "we have errors" is a grammatically sound and relatively common way to acknowledge the presence of mistakes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable expression. It's crucial to provide context and corrective actions when using this phrase, particularly in professional or academic settings. While it can appear across various contexts, including News & Media and Science, alternatives like ""we made mistakes"" or "we found inaccuracies" may be more appropriate depending on the specific situation and desired level of accountability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we made mistakes

This alternative uses "mistakes" instead of "errors", suggesting a more active role in causing the issues.

we found inaccuracies

This focuses on the discovery of inaccuracies rather than the mere existence of errors.

we detected faults

This alternative uses a stronger term, "faults", implying more significant problems.

we identified discrepancies

This highlights inconsistencies or differences, implying a need for reconciliation.

there are mistakes present

This alternative emphasizes the existence of mistakes in a more passive way.

there are inaccuracies

This uses "inaccuracies", focusing on the lack of precision or correctness.

errors exist

This is a more concise and direct way of stating the existence of errors.

we are in error

This places the responsibility for the errors on the speaker or their group.

we have made omissions

This suggests errors due to something being left out rather than incorrect information being included.

we have some glitches

This uses a more informal term, "glitches", suggesting minor or temporary errors.

FAQs

What is the difference between "we have errors" and "we made mistakes"?

"We have errors" is a statement of fact indicating the presence of errors. "We made mistakes" implies responsibility for causing those errors.

What can I say instead of "we have errors"?

You can use alternatives like "we found inaccuracies", "there are mistakes present", or "errors exist" depending on the context.

How do I use "we have errors" in a sentence?

You can use "we have errors" to acknowledge mistakes in data, reports, or systems. For example: "After reviewing the initial results, we have errors that need to be addressed."

Is it better to say "we have errors" or "there are errors"?

Both are grammatically correct. "We have errors" is more direct and may imply a degree of responsibility. "There are errors" is more general and focuses on the existence of the errors.