Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we have characterised

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we have characterised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the results of a study or analysis, indicating that you have defined or described certain characteristics of a subject. Example: "In our research, we have characterised the behavior of the species under various environmental conditions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Therefore we have characterised the hierarchical organisation of collagen VI across multiple length scales.

We have characterised the molecular interactions in collagen chitosan complex by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

We have characterised the individual stages of a swell and etch treatment of epoxy resins with a variety of techniques.

We have characterised the mechanical and surface properties of conventional collagen gels using shear rheology and scanning electron microscopy.

In this work, we have characterised an RGD-tagged, cell-targeted multifunctional β-galactosidase carrying a poly-lysine-based DNA-binding domain.

In summary, we have characterised HPV and established an experimental set-up optimized for investigation of the basic mechanisms of HPV in mice.

We have characterised a range of modified poly vinyl chloride) (PVC) membranes based on their permeability and selectivity to electrochemically active species.

As saliva contributes to oral homeostasis, we have characterised its properties and flow rate in pregnant women with or without diabetes.

We have characterised the FAD2 gene family from Hiptage benghalensis, a tropical plant that accumulates high levels of ricinoleic acid in its seeds.

In this study, using the MALDI-TOF-MS technique, we have characterised a new 25.7-kDa spore wall protein (SWP26) recognised by monoclonal antibody 2G10.

We have characterised the binding of wild type GAD65 to the GAD1 monoclonal antibody using SPRi.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we have characterised" to introduce a section where you will provide a detailed analysis of a particular phenomenon, substance, or entity.

Common error

Avoid using "we have characterised" if you only present a superficial overview. Ensure your analysis is thorough and provides substantial detail to justify the claim of characterization.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we have characterised" serves as an introductory statement in scientific and academic writing. It indicates that the authors have provided a comprehensive description of a subject's attributes. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is commonly used to introduce detailed analyses, fitting the pattern observed in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we have characterised" is a frequently used phrase in scientific and academic writing to signal a comprehensive description of a subject's properties. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and suggests that it's used to introduce thorough analyses. Its usage is almost exclusively confined to scientific contexts. Alternatives include "we have defined" or "we have described", though these may lack the emphasis on a comprehensive analysis implied by the original phrase. It's crucial to ensure that the subsequent description is detailed and justified when using this phrase. As the Ludwig AI suggests, the phrase is grammatically correct and predominantly found in formal, scientific contexts.

More alternative expressions(6)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we have defined

This alternative replaces "characterised" with a more direct term for outlining specific attributes. The similarity lies in the act of specifying qualities, but "defined" might imply greater precision.

we have identified

This suggests finding and pointing out something specific. "Identified" focuses on discovery, while "characterised" focuses on a comprehensive description.

we have described

This alternative is a more general way of saying that information about something has been provided. This is in terms of attributes or features. But is less precise or in-depth than the original.

we have determined

This suggests reaching a conclusion or decision about something. The emphasis is on the result of an investigation, rather than a detailed description.

we have assessed

This indicates an evaluation or judgment has been made. The focus is on appraisal rather than a complete characterisation.

we have investigated

This emphasizes the process of inquiry rather than the final description. The alternative implies a deeper dive into a subject.

we have analyzed

This indicates a systematic examination of components or elements. It centers on detailed scrutiny rather than holistic portrayal.

we have explored

This suggests venturing into an unknown area for discovery. The emphasis is on discovery through examination.

we have examined

This implies a careful inspection or scrutiny. It places focus on thorough observation and assessment.

we have studied

This indicates a detailed academic investigation. Is less specific than the original.

FAQs

What does "we have characterised" mean in academic writing?

In academic writing, "we have characterised" means that the authors have provided a comprehensive description of the properties, features, or nature of something. It implies a detailed analysis and explanation.

Is "we have characterised" the same as "we have described"?

While similar, "we have characterised" implies a more thorough and systematic analysis than "we have described". Characterising involves identifying and detailing key attributes, whereas describing is a more general term for giving information about something. See also "we have described".

What are some alternatives to "we have characterised" in a research paper?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "we have defined", "we have identified", or "we have analysed". Choose the alternative that best reflects the specific type of investigation conducted. See also "we have defined" or "we have identified".

How can I use "we have characterised" correctly in a sentence?

Ensure that the sentence clearly indicates what you have characterised and that the following text provides a comprehensive explanation of its key features. For example, "In this study, we have characterised the genetic structure of the population."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: