we had submitted

USAGE SUMMARY

"we had submitted" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
For example: "We had submitted our grant proposal to the foundation by last Friday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

"We had submitted conditions back in April.

The Washington Post

We had submitted questions in advance for the interview at which Ms. Weaver failed to appear.

The New York Times

"We had submitted defence for the case of 'refusing or failing to submit to sample collection' by Friday's deadline.

The Guardian - Sport

We had submitted our offer to acquire Valencia in December 2013 and did not expect that it is a long and protracted one.

The Guardian - Sport

"It means that the European officials were giving the paper that we had submitted the serious consideration that I think it actually deserved," he said.

The New York Times

"We had submitted an application for an identification parade, but the accused protested and said that they did not want to be presented for the parade," said Vinod Kumar Dhawan, the superintendent of police in the Kullu district.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

"We have submitted our interpretations of the facts".

The New York Times

"We have submitted the report in 29 days.

The New York Times

A Universal spokesman said: "We have submitted one version and have yet to receive a response".

The Guardian - Film

We have submitted language that you can define what a civilian firearm is".

The Guardian

Gethin Jenkins, Cardiff's chief executive, said: "We have submitted our accounts in accordance with Football League regulations.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we had submitted", ensure the context clearly indicates that the submission occurred before another specific event or time in the past. This clarifies the sequence of actions and enhances the overall clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "we had submitted" when a simple past tense ("we submitted") is sufficient. The past perfect is only necessary when indicating an action completed before another action in the past.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we had submitted" functions as a past perfect verb phrase, indicating an action completed before another point in time in the past. Ludwig's examples confirm its use in various contexts where this temporal relationship is crucial.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

26%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Unknown

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we had submitted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used past perfect phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and applicability across varied contexts such as news, science, and academia. It serves to establish a clear sequence of events in the past, indicating that the submission occurred before another point in time. The phrase is generally neutral to professional, making it suitable for formal and informal communications. When using this phrase, ensure that the past perfect tense is indeed necessary to accurately reflect the chronology of events; otherwise, the simple past tense ("we submitted") might suffice. Consider using alternatives like "we submitted previously" for different shades of meaning or emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we submitted previously

Replaces "had submitted" with "submitted previously" to emphasize the act of submission at an earlier time.

we filed earlier

Uses "filed" as a synonym for "submitted", suggesting a formal submission, and specifies it happened "earlier".

we presented before

Employs "presented" instead of "submitted", suitable when referring to presenting information or documents.

we tendered formerly

Replaces "submitted" with "tendered" and "had" with "formerly", offering a more formal and less common alternative.

we dispatched in advance

Uses "dispatched" to imply sending something off officially, adding "in advance" for clarity.

we forwarded already

Replaces "had submitted" with "forwarded already", changing the nuance to emphasize the action of sending something on.

we lodged beforehand

Substitutes "submitted" with "lodged", indicating a formal placement or registration, and includes "beforehand".

we handed in prior

Offers a more informal alternative using "handed in" and "prior", suitable for less formal contexts.

we transmitted earlier on

Uses "transmitted" for sending data or information, adding "earlier on" to specify the timing.

we delivered in the past

Replaces "had submitted" with "delivered in the past", offering a more general and slightly less formal alternative.

FAQs

How do I use "we had submitted" correctly in a sentence?

Use "we had submitted" to indicate that an action of submitting something was completed before another action or point in time in the past. For example, "We had submitted the report before the deadline arrived."

What's the difference between "we had submitted" and "we submitted"?

"We submitted" implies a simple past action. "We had submitted" indicates that the submission was completed before another event in the past. The choice depends on the chronological relationship you want to convey.

Can I use "we had submitted" in formal writing?

Yes, "we had submitted" is appropriate for formal writing when the past perfect tense is required to accurately reflect the sequence of past events.

What are some alternatives to "we had submitted" that I can use?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "we submitted previously", "we filed earlier", or "we presented before".