we had documentation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we had documentation" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the existence of written records or materials that were available at a certain time in the past. Example: "During the project, we had documentation that outlined all the necessary procedures and guidelines."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

We had documentation centres in Cambodia working for 10 years before there was a court.

The Guardian

Now we had documentation that proved our suspicions to be accurate," said John Raines.

Vice

In addition, because we had documentation of ART pick-up from pharmacy records, we knew that missed pharmacy visits implied that patients were not taking ART dispensed from the ABUTH clinic.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

"And we have documentation to back that up," states Julio Salazar, President of the Society for the Promotion of Spanish Kissing, which is spearheading the lawsuit.

Huffington Post

Regarding bureaucratic work, the delegation of non-physicians' and non-nurses' work to other professionals (e.g. documentation assistants) should be intensified and technological systems, e.g. a paperless hospital, made more use of: " we have documentation assistants for this, or the technology solves the problem for us".

BMC Palliative Care

(Clinical service provider) The law is so, kind of, not clear that it is very hard to clarify anything and we do have documentation we give out occasionally from the criminal … CPS [Crown Prosecution Service].

Critical Public Health

The law is so, kind of, not clear that it is very hard to clarify anything and we do have documentation we give out occasionally from the criminal … CPS [Crown Prosecution Service].

Critical Public Health

None had documentation of adenovirus vaccination.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

We do have documentation".

Huffington Post

So we do have documentation to show that Research 2000 was doing business with research companies and survey call centers, albeit eight to ten years ago.

Huffington Post

We answered guards' questions, walked through a metal detector (I knew by now not to wear an underwire bra), and submitted to a guard's censure when we didn't have documentation for our kids.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "we had documentation", ensure that the type of documentation is clear from the context. Specify what kind of records or evidence you possessed for clarity.

Common error

Don't use "we had documentation" without specifying what the documentation was about. Vague references can confuse your audience. Instead of just saying "we had documentation", specify, for example, "we had documentation of the experimental results."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we had documentation" functions as a statement indicating that a group or entity possessed written records or evidence at a particular point in the past. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we had documentation" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate past possession of records or evidence. Ludwig AI confirms this. Its usage spans across various contexts, including news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, clarity about the specific type of documentation is crucial to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "we possessed records" or "we held evidence" can add nuance depending on the context. This linguistic analysis provides guidance on best practices and common errors to enhance writing precision and effectiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we possessed records

Emphasizes formal ownership of the records.

we maintained records

Highlights the act of keeping and updating records over time.

we held evidence

Focuses on the evidentiary nature of the documentation.

records were in our possession

Passive construction emphasizing the location of the records.

we kept a record

Highlights the action of documenting information.

evidence was available to us

Highlights accessibility rather than direct possession.

the documents were ours

Stresses ownership of the documents.

we were in receipt of documents

More formal way of saying we received documents.

documents were at our disposal

Emphasizes our ability to use those documents when needed.

we archived data

Focuses on storing data for future use.

FAQs

What does "we had documentation" mean?

The phrase "we had documentation" means that at a certain time in the past, a group or entity possessed or had access to written records, materials, or evidence.

What can I say instead of "we had documentation"?

You can use alternatives like "we possessed records", "we maintained records", or "we held evidence" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "we have documentation" or "we had documentation"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they refer to different timeframes. "We have documentation" indicates present possession, while "we had documentation" indicates past possession.

How do I use "we had documentation" in a sentence?

You can use "we had documentation" in a sentence like, "During the audit, we presented the documentation we had to verify the financial records."