we found errors in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we found errors in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when reporting or discussing mistakes or inaccuracies discovered in a document, project, or analysis. Example: "After reviewing the report, we found errors in the data analysis section that need to be corrected."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Sorry, but we found errors in the text and Table 3.

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Respiratory diseases accounted for 30.2%% of deaths in this study (Table  4).> In this study, we found errors in 160 (78.4 %) DCs.

BMC Health Services Research

For inpatient prescribing, we found errors in 15% of 6605 medication orders, of which 19% were predicted to have serious consequences to the patient if not corrected.

BMJ Quality and Safety

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Dr. Maiman found errors in their calculations.

The New York Times

His death sentence was overturned last December when a federal judge found errors in the sentencing phase of the trial.

The New York Times

Detroit shut down its police crime lab last year after an outside audit found errors in 10percentt of cases surveyed.

The New York Times

Two executives resigned last week after Adecco said it found errors in the way it accounted for revenue.

The New York Times

Lammy highlighted the Duggan inquest that concluded with a verdict of lawful killing and found errors in the police investigation.

The Guardian

The agency said it found errors in as many as 94% of the returns audited.

Forbes

Ultimately Harrison found errors in his apparatus and once these were corrected the lasers operated properly.

SEP

A study by the Policy and Economic Research Council found errors in 19percentt of credit reports they examined.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting errors, be specific about the type and location of the errors to facilitate correction.

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "we found errors in several sections." Instead, specify which sections contain errors and provide details about the nature of those errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we found errors in" functions as a reporting verb phrase. It indicates the discovery of mistakes or inaccuracies within a specific context, often requiring further investigation or correction. As seen in Ludwig, this phrase is used to communicate that flaws or mistakes have been identified.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we found errors in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression for reporting the discovery of mistakes or inaccuracies. According to Ludwig AI, the expression is suitable for various contexts, including scientific, news, and business writing. To enhance clarity, be specific about the errors when using this phrase. Consider alternatives like "we detected inaccuracies in" or "we identified mistakes in" for stylistic variation. Ludwig's examples provide further context on how to effectively employ this phrase in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we detected inaccuracies in

Replaces 'errors' with 'inaccuracies', emphasizing a lack of precision rather than outright mistakes.

we identified mistakes in

Substitutes 'found' with 'identified' and 'errors' with 'mistakes', offering a more direct and active tone.

errors were identified in

Changes from active to passive voice, shifting the focus from the discoverer to the errors themselves.

we discovered flaws within

Replaces 'errors' with 'flaws', suggesting more fundamental problems or weaknesses.

inaccuracies were present in

Similar to changing to passive voice, but uses 'inaccuracies' instead of 'errors'.

we observed discrepancies in

Replaces 'errors' with 'discrepancies', highlighting inconsistencies rather than definite mistakes.

the analysis revealed faults in

Attributes the discovery to 'the analysis', making the sentence more formal and objective.

shortcomings were apparent in

Uses 'shortcomings' to denote deficiencies or inadequacies, rather than outright errors.

we noted some inaccuracies

A more gentle and less accusatory way of pointing out errors.

the data contained inconsistencies

Shifts the focus to the data itself, stating that it was inconsistent without explicitly mentioning errors.

FAQs

What's a more formal way to say "we found errors in"?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "we detected inaccuracies in", "we identified mistakes in", or "the analysis revealed faults in".

How can I phrase "we found errors in" to sound less accusatory?

To soften the statement, you might say "we noted some inaccuracies" or "the data contained inconsistencies". These options focus on the presence of errors without directly assigning blame.

What's the difference between saying "we found errors in" and "we found discrepancies in"?

While both phrases indicate problems, "we found discrepancies in" suggests inconsistencies or differences that may not necessarily be outright mistakes. "We found errors in" implies more definite inaccuracies.

Can I use "we found errors in" in a formal academic paper?

Yes, the phrase "we found errors in" is acceptable for use in academic papers. However, be sure to provide specific details about the errors and their impact.