Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

we expected to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we expected to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when expressing anticipation or a belief about a future event or outcome. Example: "We expected to finish the project by the end of the month, but unforeseen challenges arose."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We expected to do well.

News & Media

The Guardian

"We expected to be here.

"Like we expected to win.

Were we expected to cube it ourselves?

We expected to win this game".

We expected to win tonight".

"We expected to have a lull.

News & Media

The New York Times

We expected to sink without trace.

News & Media

The Guardian

We expected to get a victory.

What months are we expected to be in DC?

Are we expected to replace that child's shoes?

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we expected to" when describing a prior belief or anticipation of a future event. Ensure the context clearly indicates who "we" refers to and what the expectation was.

Common error

Avoid using "we expect to" when referring to a past expectation. "We expect to" indicates a current expectation, while "we expected to" refers to something anticipated in the past.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we expected to" functions as a verb phrase expressing a past anticipation, belief, or prediction. It is used to describe something that a group or individual thought would occur in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase follows standard grammatical rules.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we expected to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to express past anticipation or belief. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It's suitable for various contexts, though primarily found in news, scientific, and academic writing. When using this phrase, ensure the tense is correct and that the context clearly defines the subject and the expected outcome. Alternatives like "we anticipated" or "we predicted" can add nuance, but "we expected to" remains a versatile and reliable choice for conveying past expectations.

FAQs

How can I use "we expected to" in a sentence?

Use "we expected to" to describe something your group or team thought would happen in the past. For example, "We expected to win the game, but we lost".

What are some alternatives to "we expected to"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "we anticipated", "we predicted", or "we had envisioned".

Is it correct to say "we expect to" instead of "we expected to"?

The correctness depends on the time frame. "We expect to" refers to a current expectation, while "we expected to" refers to a past expectation. Make sure to use the correct tense to accurately convey your intended meaning.

What's the difference between "we expected to" and "we hoped to"?

"We expected to" suggests a stronger belief or anticipation based on some form of evidence or reasoning. "We hoped to", on the other hand, implies a desire for something to happen, without necessarily having a strong basis for believing it would.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: