we expected for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we expected for" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be used as "we expected" or "we expected that." Example: "We expected that the project would be completed by the end of the month."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

"It's about what we expected for the time of year it is," he said outside a bear weigh-in station in Wawayanda State Park in Vernon.

The New York Times

"I'm happy with our result today and it's much better than we expected for the first race of the season," said Hamilton.

The New York Times - Sports

Investec analyst Michael Blogg said: In an environment where industrial companies are struggling to find much growth, 4% organic in the first four months is very respectable (and much as we expected for the first half and full year).

The Guardian - Business

Its impact was far greater than we expected, for when the National People's Congress, China's parliament, known as 'rubber stamp', voted on the project in 1992, one-third of the delegates decided against it.

The Guardian

"The people of Edinburgh rightly expect to know why we're paying three times as much as we expected for only a third of the network we were promised," he added.

Independent

As we expected, for RT-Link and S-MAC, the SJ's lifetime is very high.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

What can we expect for the next four years?

The New York Times

What can we expect for your future writing career?

The Guardian

But exactly how much should we expect for our investment?

The Guardian - Tech

What can we expect for Tiana's love life?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

So, what has been their contribution and what might we expect for the future?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "we expected for". Instead, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "we expected" or "we anticipated".

Common error

The phrase "we expected for" incorrectly uses the preposition "for". To express expectation correctly, use "we expected" followed by a clause, or use alternatives like "we anticipated" or "we were expecting".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we expected for" is an incorrect attempt to express anticipation or prediction. It violates standard English grammar rules, according to Ludwig AI, and it's generally understood as a grammatical error. Grammatically correct alternatives exist to communicate the intended meaning.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "we expected for" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. According to Ludwig AI analysis, this phrase does not follow standard grammar rules. The proper way to express the intended meaning is to use "we expected" followed by a clause specifying what was expected, or to use alternatives such as "we anticipated" or "we were expecting". This correction ensures clarity and adheres to established grammatical conventions. Because no examples were found, and considering this phrase as incorrect, it's best to use alternative expressions. Note also that there aren't authoritative sources that use this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we had expected

Adding "had" emphasizes that the expectation occurred in the past.

we had been expecting

A perfect continuous form to show an ongoing expectation up to a point in the past.

we anticipated

This alternative replaces "expected for" with a single word that conveys a similar meaning of foreseeing something.

we were anticipating

Using the continuous tense highlights the process of expecting.

we foresaw

Similar to "anticipated", but implies a more distinct sense of having seen something beforehand.

we predicted

Focuses on making a specific claim about the future.

it was our expectation

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the expectation itself.

we were looking forward to

Expresses a sense of positive anticipation.

we presumed

Implies an assumption based on probability, but doesn't necessarily mean a firm prediction.

we believed

This suggests expectation based on personal certainty.

FAQs

How to correct the phrase "we expected for"?

Replace "we expected for" with "we expected" followed by a clause, such as "we expected that the project would succeed". Alternatively, use phrases like "we anticipated" or "we were expecting".

What's the difference between "we expected" and "we expected for"?

"We expected" is grammatically correct and expresses a belief about a future event or outcome. "We expected for" is not standard English and should be avoided. Instead you can use sentences like "we had expected".

What can I say instead of "we expected for"?

Use alternatives like "we anticipated", "we predicted", or "it was our expectation" depending on the context.

Is "we expected for" grammatically correct?

No, "we expected for" is not grammatically correct in standard English. Use "we expected" or rephrase your sentence using alternatives such as "we anticipated".