Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
For the DPGP2 and AGES genomes, we excluded the same recurrent IBD regions as those of Pool et al. (2012).
We excluded the same controls as had been excluded in the WTCCC2 (44) and WTCCC3 (45) studies, plus an additional four controls that we found to be outliers, following a principal components analysis using the 'smartpca' routine of the EIGENSOFT package (37).
Similar(58)
In order to keep the different models comparable, we exclude the same markers in all the models.
We therefore, excluded the same number of most conserved genes (e.g. genes present in all taxa in each group).
From the obtained results, we excluded the hits matching on the same chromosomal locus representing likely splice variants or mispredictions.
This did not change when we excluded the swapped nestlings and did the same analysis using only the chicks that stayed with their biological parents (r = −0.27, p = 0.21, N = 23 for female parents, and r = 0.06, p = 0.76, N = 23 for males).
The results were the same when we excluded the OC users.
Since we included two studies by the same authors, we excluded the older study 21 in the subsequent analyses to reduce the heterogeneity.
Based on the same reasoning, we excluded the use of inhaled or systemic steroids in the six weeks preceding study, since this would likely affect levels of inflammatory cells and mediators in sputum and plasma [ 18].
Finally, after we investigated item-to-total correlation, we excluded those same 5 items as well.
To make sure our training dataset does not overlap with the 11 benchmark RNA molecules, we exclude the representative structures in the same cluster as the 11 benchmark RNA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com