Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In addition, we evaluated test performance when classifying IPA according to the predefined EORTC/MSG criteria (without ICU stay as a host factor) [ 34] and a previously published clinical algorithm [ 35], instead of our modified EORTC/MSG criteria.
Similar(59)
In this study we evaluated test-retest reliability i.e. how well a score produces the same outcome when the questionnaire is given to the same individual on separate occasions but close to each other in time.
We evaluated test-retest reliability by letting the patients complete the questionnaires twice: the first time about 1 week before surgery, and the second time on the day before or on the day of surgery, but always before the surgery.
We evaluated test-retest reliability of the 20-item instrument by asking 38 patients with a range of cancers in different stages in treatment (who were not part of the cohort described below) to complete it on two occasions 2 3 weeks apart.
Using the HLA-predictive methodology described above, we evaluated testing accuracies given various flanking-region sizes following Li et al.'s [ 13].
We evaluate test properties in the presence or absence of heterogeneity, using different estimators of heterogeneity and by employing different methods for inference about pairwise summary effects (Knapp-Hartung and inverse variance methods).
We evaluate Test-mate against a reference laboratory test in patients with acute organophosphorus self-poisoning.
We have only evaluated tests based on the McNemar statistic.
What made OpenX stand out? "Without disclosing any specific numbers, it comes down decreasing cost and increasing yield — that's how we evaluated the test," Criscuolo said.
We evaluated whether test orders were predictive of disease incidence.
We defined cut-off points and established a diagnostic algorithm based on the first set of patients and controls; subsequently we evaluated the test performance in the other set of cases and controls.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com