Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Because as good a book as Freakonomics is, we disqualified it due to an error that authors Stephen Levitt and Stephen Dubner admitted to making, in a January op-ed piece in The New York Times.
Similar(59)
If we have reason to believe your Entry is not your own work or otherwise breaches this paragraph 11, then we may disqualify it.
(Although the modifications we made to the site were all temporary, our wedding involved some heavy landscaping, such as stonemasonry, the installation of a small fake pond, and other theatrical flourishes that might have disqualified it).
If Durkin had been disqualified, it would have been a rare step in federal court.
If we have reason to believe your entry is in breach of this paragraph 10 then we may not consider it and may disqualify it.
If we have reason to believe your Competition entry is in breach of this paragraph 10 then we may not consider it and may disqualify it.
If we have reason to believe your entry is not your own work or is in breach of this paragraph 11 then we may not consider it and may disqualify it.
If we have reason to believe your Submission is not your own work or otherwise breaches this paragraph 13, then we may not consider it and may disqualify it.
However, we will show later in this section that MI has an intrinsic disadvantage, which disqualifies it as a good metric for validating the double-directional multipath structure of a time-varying channel.
That automatically disqualifies it from winning the X prize.
That doesn't disqualify it from being good.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com