Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
If (|y|ge R_{3}/2), then by a similar approach we deduce again relation (16).
If (|y|gefrac{R_{2}}{2}), then in a similar way as above, we deduce again relation (14).
Similar(58)
Applying Lemma 2.2 again, we deduce that (1-(2+C)+2C=0), which implies that (C=1).
Again, we deduce that there exists a constant (K_{1.1}>0) with sup_{x geq0} F_{1}(x) leq K_{1.1}.
Again, we deduce from Lemmas 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 that S N and N are continuous and completely continuous.
Again, we deduce from Lemmas 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 that S P and P are continuous and completely continuous.
Again, we deduce that there exists a constant (K_{1.1}>0) with sup_{x geq0} B_{1}(x) leq K_{1.1}.
But then, using the boundedness of u̅ and v̅ and the maximum principle again, we deduce (overline{u}equivoverline{v}equiv0) on ([t_{1}, infty )timesmathbb{T}_{lambda_{0}}): a contradiction.
end{aligned} Combining these inequalities and using again Theorem 16, we deduce the estimate asserted.
By applying again Theorem 2, we deduce that, for every (min mathbb {N}), there exists a solution (xi_{m}) of problem ((D_{c_{m},h(c_{m})})) belonging to the functional interval ([x_,beta]), again with (Vert xi_{m} Vert _{C(I }le M) and (Vert xi_{m}' Vert _{C(I }leLambda) for every (min mathbb {N}).
Moreover, since ((X,p)) is complete, again by Lemma 1.9 we deduce the completeness of ((X,p^{S})).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com