we currently have

USAGE SUMMARY

"we currently have" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a current state of affairs or to indicate that something is still applicable at the present time. For example: "We currently have 3 open positions at our company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We currently have a deeply depressed economy.

The New York Times

We currently have no plans to change.

The New York Times

We currently have a hung parliament.

The Guardian - Opinion

We currently have about two.

The Guardian - Sport

So we currently have five creatures.

The New York Times - Magazine

We currently have about 6,000.

The New York Times - Health

We currently have a massive recruitment crisis.

The Guardian

We currently have 3 licensed technicians.

Cornell University

We currently have open academic opportunities.

Cornell University

We currently have four major research directions.

University of California, Berkeley

We currently have investors supporting our work.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we currently have" to clearly state the present situation, avoiding ambiguity about the time frame. This is especially useful in reports, presentations, or explanations where clarity is key.

Common error

Do not use "we currently have" when the context already implies the present. For example, instead of saying "We currently have plans in place for next year", simply say "We have plans in place for next year" if the present relevance is understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we currently have" functions as a statement of present possession or condition. It's used to inform about the existing state of affairs, as confirmed by Ludwig. Examples from Ludwig show its application in various contexts, from describing economic conditions to available resources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Academia

32%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we currently have" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to indicate present possession, state, or availability. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and utility across different contexts. As evidenced by examples from news sources, academic papers, and other reputable sources, the phrase is suitable for a variety of settings, although ensuring conciseness and avoiding redundancy is advised. Common alternatives include phrases like "at present we possess" and "currently, we are in possession of", depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

At present we possess

Replaces "currently have" with a more formal vocabulary.

Currently, we are in possession of

More elaborate, emphasizing legal or formal ownership.

As of now, we hold

Similar to 'have' but implies temporary or conditional holding.

What we have at the moment is

Adds a sense of immediacy and possibly limitation.

In our current situation, we have

Contextualizes the phrase within existing circumstances.

We now own

Focuses specifically on ownership rather than general possession.

We are equipped with

Emphasizes readiness or capability due to what is possessed.

The status quo is that we have

Introduces the phrase as an explanation of the current state of affairs.

Our present resources include

Highlights available resources rather than a general state.

We have in our inventory

Specifically refers to items in stock or available for use.

FAQs

How can I use "we currently have" in a sentence?

Use "we currently have" to describe a present state, possession, or condition. For example, "We currently have three open positions" indicates the immediate availability of those jobs.

What are some alternatives to "we currently have"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "at present we possess", "currently, we are in possession of" or "as of now, we hold".

Is it redundant to use "currently" with "have"?

While "have" often implies the present, "currently" emphasizes the immediate relevance and can be useful for clarity, especially when discussing changes over time. Omitting "currently" is acceptable in many contexts.

What's the difference between "we currently have" and "we had"?

"We currently have" refers to a present state, while "we had" refers to something possessed or experienced in the past. For example, "We currently have a team of five" indicates the team's present size, whereas "We had a team of five" indicates the team's size at some point in the past.