Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we could lose
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we could lose" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing potential negative outcomes or risks in a situation. Example: "If we don't prepare adequately for the presentation, we could lose the client's trust."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
We could lose four.
News & Media
"We could lose".
News & Media
"We could lose and still advance.
News & Media
We could lose a few clubs, possibly".
News & Media
We could lose the BBC".
News & Media
We could lose significant senior scientific brains.
News & Media
"We just didn't think we could lose.
News & Media
Here's what we could lose for good.
News & Media
PREMINGER: I really didn't feel we could lose.
News & Media
As a result, we could lose public trust.
News & Media
Does it mean we could lose weight while eating it?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "we could lose", ensure the context clearly indicates what might be lost. This adds precision and avoids ambiguity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "we could lose" without a specific object or goal in mind. A lack of clarity can confuse the reader and weaken the impact of your statement.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we could lose" functions as a modal phrase expressing a possibility or potential outcome. The modal verb "could" indicates a degree of uncertainty, while "lose" signifies the potential negative result. Ludwig examples show diverse applications of this phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
85%
Formal & Business
8%
Science
3%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
1%
Wiki
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "we could lose" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to express the potential for a negative outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and widespread use. It is prevalent in News & Media sources and carries a neutral register suitable for diverse contexts. To ensure clarity, specify what "we" might lose and avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "we risk losing" for a slightly more formal tone.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we risk losing
Emphasizes the risk involved in a situation, implying a chance of losing something.
we might forfeit
Replaces "could" with "might" and "lose" with "forfeit", suggesting a possibility of losing something.
we are in danger of losing
Highlights the perilous state of potentially losing something.
we may relinquish
Substitutes "could" with "may" and "lose" with "relinquish", indicating a potential act of giving up something.
we face the potential of losing
Focuses on the potential negative outcome of facing a loss.
we stand to forfeit
Uses "stand to" to highlight the potential consequence of forfeiting something.
we are liable to lose
Suggests a probability or tendency to lose something, replacing "could" with "liable to".
a loss is possible
Expresses the potential for loss in a more impersonal and passive way.
there's a chance we'll be defeated
Replaces "lose" with "defeated", suggesting a potential failure or setback.
defeat is a possibility
Rephrases the idea as a general possibility of defeat, rather than a direct statement.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "we could lose" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "we risk losing" or "we stand to forfeit", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
What does "we could lose" imply in a sentence?
It implies a possibility of suffering a loss or negative outcome. The extent of the potential loss depends on the context in which the phrase is used.
Is there a difference between "we could lose" and "we might lose"?
The difference is subtle, but "we could lose" suggests a slightly higher probability or a greater sense of vulnerability compared to "we might lose". They are often interchangeable though.
Can "we could lose" be used in positive contexts?
While typically used in negative contexts, "we could lose" could be part of a larger statement where avoiding the loss leads to a positive result. For example: "If we invest now, we could lose some initial capital, but gain significant returns later."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested