Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
we contacted with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "we contacted with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form is "we contacted" or "we got in touch with." Example: "We contacted the supplier to discuss the new order."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
we reached out to
we got in touch with
we contacted
we communicated with
we spoke with
we corresponded with
we consulted with
we liaised with
we connected with
we encountered with
we negotiated with
we ascertained with
we initiated with
we confronted with
we talked with
we came across
we met with
we discovered
we discovered with
we observed
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
When necessary, we contacted with the authors for more details of their studies and gathered information from prior reviews [ 15, 16, 21].
Science
When we contacted with IRB and KFDA for approval of the protocol of this study, the best concern was that the dexmedetomidine is not an anaesthetic drug and there is no guarantee of safety when administered as conventional method with other anaesthetic drugs.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
This article originally appeared on VICE US.
News & Media
We contacted study authors with unresolved queries.
We have contacted her with our apologies.
News & Media
We've contacted AppGratis with questions and requests for comment.
News & Media
IF CURIOSITY LANDS AND WERKS CORRECTLOSEI.E., FARTS AROUND ON A DESERT PLANET FOR A FEW YEARS AND STUDIES A FEW ROCONTACTATIONS BEFORE WITHING OUT ITS BATTERY, PROVIDING NO TANGIBLE BENEFITS TO HUMANITY Words to avoid: "2.5 billion dollars".
News & Media
Fortunately we managed to add a top-up before we lost contact with Babbage".
News & Media
"We have contact with advisers to the new government leaders; hopefully we can draw their attention".
News & Media
We lost contact with Spirit in 2010.
News & Media
We lost contact with Moni, too.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "we contacted" or "we got in touch with" instead of "we contacted with". The preposition "with" is unnecessary and grammatically incorrect in this context.
Common error
Avoid adding "with" after "contacted". It is a common mistake that makes the sentence grammatically incorrect. Always double-check your sentences to ensure correct preposition usage.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "we contacted with" functions as a verb phrase where "contacted" is the main verb. However, it's grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct form is simply "we contacted" without the preposition.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "we contacted with" is a grammatically incorrect construction. As noted by Ludwig AI, the correct form is simply "we contacted". Although examples of the incorrect phrase exist, particularly in science and news media contexts, its rarity and grammatical status suggest avoiding it in formal writing. Alternative phrases such as "we got in touch with" or "we reached out to" offer grammatically sound ways to convey the same meaning. Always double-check for correct preposition usage to ensure clarity and professionalism in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
we contacted
Removes the unnecessary preposition "with", resulting in a grammatically correct phrase.
we got in touch with
Replaces "contacted" with a more idiomatic expression meaning the same thing.
we reached out to
Offers a slightly more informal alternative to "contacted", suitable for a variety of contexts.
we communicated with
Suggests a more general form of interaction beyond just initial contact.
we were in touch with
Indicates an ongoing connection or communication.
we spoke with
Specifically denotes a verbal conversation.
we corresponded with
Implies written communication, such as letters or emails.
we consulted with
Indicates seeking advice or information from someone.
we liaised with
Suggests acting as a link between parties.
we had discussions with
Implies a series of conversations or a more in-depth exchange.
FAQs
Is it grammatically correct to say "we contacted with"?
No, the correct phrase is "we contacted". The preposition "with" is unnecessary and makes the sentence grammatically incorrect. Alternatives include "we got in touch with".
What's the difference between "we contacted" and "we got in touch with"?
While both phrases mean the same thing, "we contacted" is more direct and formal, while "we got in touch with" is more idiomatic and slightly less formal. Choose the phrase that best fits the context and your desired tone.
What are some alternatives to "we contacted"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "we reached out to", "we communicated with", or "we spoke with".
How do I use "we contacted" in a sentence?
Use "we contacted" followed by the person or organization you contacted. For example, "we contacted the supplier to discuss the order".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested