Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
We considered published and unpublished studies.
We considered published meta-analyses of RCTs of psychotherapeutic treatments in journals with a 2012 IF of ≥5 based on Journal Citation Report (JCR, 2012).
We considered published mathematical models of the IkB-NF-kB [ 8, 10, 31- 35], mammalian cell cycle [ 36] and p53-Mdm2 [ 4, 11, 37- 40] systems that describe their evolution in time.
Similar(56)
Thomson Reuters found that the disparity is even more stark when we consider published research.
Should we consider publishing the paper?
We only considered published full-text study results, no short reports, no conference presentations or study protocols.
We also considered published review articles, editorials, and internet-based sources of information (www.tctmd.com, www.theheart.org) to assess potential information on studies of interest.
We also considered published review articles, editorials, and internet based sources of information (www.tctmd.com, www.theheart.org).org
These are considered published work.
Because these papers are not considered published, their review is not synchronous.
Only full text versions of studies were considered (published or unpublished).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com