Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
And shouldn't we consider the source?
We consider the source admittance as Y 1.
His viewpoint is easier to see if we consider the source rather than the fate of the matter and energy organisms use to sustain life.
We consider the source approximation with the quasi-reversibility regularization f ϵ ( x ) = ∑ n = 1 ∞ ( ∫ 0 1 e n 2 A ( t ) φ ϵ ( t ) d t ) − 1 g n ϵ sin n x ϵ + e − n 2 A ( 1 ).
For the sake of simplicity, we consider the source of molecules to be a solid sphere of radius R 0, containing molecules of mass, M and assume the molecules to be spherical of average molecular diameter, Ω.
Though we consider the source, it must be decried.
Similar(53)
We considered the source amplitude to be the maximum value during tremor.
We considered the source characteristics of explosion event waveforms recorded at station BBIL (Fig. 7a) for which sources were located near the summit vent.
Here, we consider the single source localization for the source being located at (12, 10). Figure 5 shows the resulting error, as the signal duration decreases in both methods.
When circular zones of three or more stations intersect at the same location, we then consider the source as being located.
After calculating matching layers, we consider the energy source as layer to design a transducer.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com