But this question is only tangentially involved when we consider the procedures designed to provide collateral review in the Federal courts for Federal constitutional claims of defendants who have been sentenced to death.
In analyses for the subset of cases with medical records data, we considered the procedure specified in the operative note to be the reference-standard.
We considered the procedure date correct if the differences between the dates in the WDHR-CCTR and the medical records were <1 week.
We considered the procedure described as the best treatment for bronchiolitis available based on the literature, and no control group was included [ 1- 3, 7].
If this technique does not seem to be feasible, we would consider the procedure risky, if the caudal margin cannot be injected transtumourally under endoscopic control with the required reliability.
We consider the presented procedure as an efficient tool for precise non-steady-state kinetic characterization of many active materials, e.g. catalysts, adsorbents, sensors, electrodes etc.
In this section we consider the estimation procedure of time-varying CO-OFDM channels, as well as the cascaded channels.
We consider the randomization procedure to be ethically acceptable, and so do our collaborators in NAV.
We consider the measuring procedure as easy to perform, and the measurements take no more than 1 or 2 min.
Here, we consider the adaptive procedure according to Bauer and Köhne [ 4] that uses Fisher's product test.
