Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We comparison of the standard approximations for lowpass filters and we find that Chebyshev II and Cauer approximations are the most favorable for realization using doubly resistively terminated lossless networks.
Similar(59)
Namely we get: comparison of the two fibers.
Because unbalanced comparisons can change the results, we excluded comparisons of the morphotypes with less than seven specimens (see Table 1).
We deliver a comparison of the approaches and describe the experiments we carried out.
In this work we show the comparison of the 3D microstructure model with a well established 1D averaged model.
Moreover, we present a comparison of the state-of-the-art MCC authentication methods considering five evaluation metrics.
Finally, we present a comparison of the Picos and Nanos++ runtime performance scalability with a set of real benchmarks.
In Table 1, we summarize the comparison of the two methods in terms of crowd cost, completion time, and accuracy.
In Fig. 5 (left side) we report the comparison of the actual and the predicted values for the load factors.
Finally, we provide the comparison of the DFTCOMM with the recently developed sparse fast Fourier transform (SFFT) algorithmic family.
We make a comparison of the performance according to a variety of offered loads (Erlang value).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com